811.7441/41
The Assistant Secretary of State (Long) to the President 1
Suggestions for cooperation between communication facilities owned or controlled by american or British interests in other parts of the world
There are two matters of radio communication which may prove troublesome; so I present them to you as briefly and succinctly as possible in the hope you may be able to present them jointly to Mr. Churchill and obtain his cooperation in solutions.
First. Direct radio telegraphic communication should be permitted and established between the United States and the various parts of the British Empire. Now all messages must go to London and be relayed. This imposes extra burden on the communication facilities in England and retards the delivery of messages. The military and naval authorities are urgently pressing me to arrange direct communication. I have just succeeded in doing so with Australia. Negotiations for circuits to India and South Africa are not proceeding satisfactorily or rapidly. I feel very strongly that we should have direct communications with those particular places immediately and that we should have as a matter of course direct communication to [Page 406] other parts of the Empire as and when our diplomatic, military and naval dispositions require it.
Second. Somewhat more delicate but of equal importance and of pressing urgency is the question of radio communication in South America. Private companies operate the radio facilities in Argentina, Brazil and Chile and are in direct communication with Tokyo, Berlin and Borne. Also they communicate to and from “Blacklist”3 firms in South America and serve as the medium for exchange of information between those firms and from them to Japan, Germany and Italy.
It is a very bad set-up in that it ties our enemies together as well as holds our neighbors closer in contact to our enemies.
The ownership of these companies is partly American, partly British, partly German and partly Italian (?)4 in about equal shares. Recently the R.C.A. and British interests have increased their holdings so they now own a majority of stock. We have tried to induce them to cease working their beams to Rome, Berlin and Tokyo but have had no success whatever in obtaining the help of the British interests. It is patent we will make no headway unless the British Government itself takes the matter in hand and directs that its own citizens, resident in England, cooperate whole-heartedly with us in our efforts to close these circuits. Obviously we will then have to secure the cooperation of the governments in South America, but we will not be in a position even to ask that unless the British cooperate.
The I.T. & T. operates one station at Lima and is doing the same thing but it has asked us to take steps with the Government of Peru to permit it to stop. The Government of Peru has indicated its willingness, if requested,—but we have not seen fit to close that one circuit if the others continue because to do so would not prevent communication with and between our enemies but would only cause a rerouting of messages to the other circuits.
Something ought to be done immediately.
I hope you can present these mutual problems to Mr. Churchill and secure from him a directive to the appropriate officials of his Government and ask him to instruct his Ambassador in Washington to confer with me at his earliest convenience so we can arrange satisfactorily both of these questions.
[Page 407]I am attaching two supporting memoranda, one on each subject, in case you want more information than the necessarily limited amount given in this memorandum.
- The matter of control of telecommunications evidently was handled by Hopkins for the President. A memorandum of December 30 by Long recorded that he had explained the problem to Hopkins at the White House that morning and that the latter “understood the situation and said that he would present it to Mr. Churchill and that he hoped to have the complete accord by Saturday night. He is entirely in accord with the proposals.” (811.7441/42)↩
- The date “Dec. 27, 1941?” has been written in pencil on the source text and on attachment 2. “December 27, 1941” was typewritten on attachment 1 as part of the original text.↩
- For text of the Proclamation Authorizing a Proclaimed List of Certain Blocked Nationals and Controlling Certain Exports, July 17, 1941, see Department of State Bulletin, vol. v, July 19, 1941, p. 42, or 55 Stat. (pt. 2) 1657. For documents relating to the application of the Proclaimed List in Latin America, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. vi , and ibid., 1942, vols. v and vi , index entries under Proclaimed List.↩
- In the copy in the Hopkins Papers, “Italian (?)” has been altered in ink to read “French”.↩