Roosevelt Papers

The Secretary of War (Stimson) to the President 1

confidential

Dear Mr. President: I have dictated the enclosed brief memorandum of my views as to the basic questions which will come before the approaching conference. I hope they may be of some assistance to you in guiding the discussions. The strategic views therein expressed have the approval of Marshall, Arnold and Gerow.

Faithfully yours,

Henry L. Stimson
[Enclosure]

Memorandum for the President:

a suggested analysis of the basic topics and their attendant problems

I

The North Atlantic

Our joint war plans have recognized the North Atlantic as our principal theatre of operations should America become involved in the war. Therefore it should now be given primary consideration and carefully reviewed in order to see whether our position there is safe. Its safety must underlie all our other efforts in the war.

[Page 45]

I suggest the following topics:

A. The safety of the British Isles

1.
Have the beach defenses been improved?
2.
What is the condition of the mobile forces defending the Isles?
3.
Should America land any major forces other than air forces in the British Isles?

Should not American forces take over the defense of Ireland, releasing the present British forces in North Ireland?

It is assumed that air forces are to go into the Isles.

B. The situation of Iceland and Greenland2

1. The possibility of the reenforcement of the American garrison in the light of further calls upon American shipping by any of the possible expeditions mentioned below.

C. American Navy in the North Atlantic

1.
Is it sufficient in size in view of the following possibilities:
a.
A violent renewal of submarine activity which is quite possible during the long winter nights.
b.
The demand for naval support for an American expeditionary force either to the Cape Verdes and Dakar, the Azores and Natal.3
c.
Possible losses to the British naval forces in the Mediterranean or the Atlantic.
2.
Should the Atlantic fleet be depleted under any circumstances in order to strengthen the Pacific fleet?

II

American Efforts in Other Theatres of the War—Their Importance and Their Order of Priority

This seems to me the most difficult and important problem of the conference. American efforts are now being either made or suggested in at least four different possible theatres of operation. They may be called for in others. They are being made or suggested in the following areas:

a.
In the southwestern Pacific theatre.
b.
In the western African theatre including the Cape Verdes and Azores.3
c.
In the Syria and Iran theatre.
d.
In the Egypt and Libya theatre.

[Page 46]

They might be forced on us in Natal where the situation at the present moment is perilous, threatening our air communication with the Far East.4

I have arranged them in what I consider their present apparent order of priority although I am supporting it suggestively rather than dogmatically:

1. The Southwestern Pacific

a.
This is of first importance because it has been forced upon us by a new combatant power which is challenging our entire position in the Pacific and our troops are already fighting desperately to carry out our legal and moral obligation to protect the Philippines.
b.
It is also of vital importance:
(1)
To assist the British in defending Singapore, the fall of which would be an almost vital blow to the British Empire as well as to our own future commercial interests in the Pacific.
(2)
To protect the Netherland East Indies and their sources of oil from falling into the hands of the Japanese and thus aiding Japan in her contest for the control of the Pacific against us.
(3)
For protecting the great dominions of Australia and New Zealand from domination by Japan.
(4)
To encourage and keep China fighting—who has and is still carrying the main effort of holding Japan in check.
(5)
To encourage Russia in staying in the war against the Axis powers.

2. The West African theatre

This theatre is vital to us in two respects:

a.
To protect our line of communications and supplies, both air and sea, with the British activities in Egypt; with the supply of Russia through the Persian Gulf; with the activities in the Far Eastern theatre through Australia and Singapore on the south and through China on the north.
b.
It is vital as a means of preventing Germany from reaching Dakar from which she would both block the trade route around Cape Horn and also threaten the South American continent.

These two reasons seem to me more vital to the interests of this country than anything we can do in the areas of the Mediterranean and the Middle East.

The method of our operations in this West African area, in which I include operations against the Cape Verdes and the Azores, are directly a question for our military advisers. Personally I regard any expedition to the Azores as strategically less important than a strong effort against the Cape Verdes and Dakar.

[Page 47]

3. The area of Syria and Iran

I think this area is strategically, and in view of the ultimate winning of the war, more important than the Egyptian area because it furnishes our safest route for help to Russia. Thus far our activities consist solely in the improvement of the base and the furnishing of supplies. There is no prospect apparent to me of combat efforts.

4. The Egyptian area

While this area is of immense importance psychologically to the British Empire and perhaps strategically as a possible though unfavorable front for an attack on Hitler in Europe, it seems to me of the least important to us as a combat area. We should of course continue our supplies to the British. In my opinion we should not divert armed forces to that area which could by any possibility be necessary for use in the Far Eastern area, in Ireland, or in the West African area.

III

The essential problems of America in the areas which I have described in the foregoing portions of this memorandum can be in summary described as follows:

  • First: The preservation of our communications across the North Atlantic with our fortress in the British Isles5 covering the British fleet.
  • Second: The protection of our communications with the Near and Far East by air via Brazil and Africa and by water around the Cape of Good Hope.
  • Third: The building up as rapidly as possible of air and sea communications in the Pacific with Australia.

Underlying all of these objectives is the immediate necessity of protecting the vital naval and air industrial establishments on the west and east coasts of the United States.

H. L. S.
  1. A notation in Stimson’s diary for December 20 reads as follows:

    “Immediately upon my arrival at the office I dictated the revised version of my memorandum to the President, giving a suggested analysis of the basic topics for the coming conference and of the various problems which were connected with them. In the next room General Marshall, together with Generals Arnold, Gerow, and Eisenhower, were engaged in stating the views of the General Staff on the same subject. When they had finished they came in and went over their paper with me, and as soon as my paper was written out by Miss Neary I went over it with them. They approved of it substantially intact, making a number of minor suggestions. A copy of mine as thus approved is attached to this daily record. Immediately after it was finished I sent a copy to the President and another one to Hopkins as a suggested guide for the coming conference.”

  2. For the negotiations earlier in 1941 regarding the sending of American troops to Greenland and Iceland, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. ii, pp. 35 ff. and 776 ff., respectively.
  3. The words “or French North Africa” were added at this point in what appears to be Roosevelt’s handwriting.
  4. The words “or French North Africa” were added at this point in what appears to be Roosevelt’s handwriting.
  5. For the “perilous” situation in Brazil, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. vi, pp. 490 ff., section entitled “Cooperation Between the United States and Brazil on Certain Measures for Hemisphere Defense”. See also Conn and Fairchild, pp. 296–312.
  6. The copy of this memorandum in the Stimson papers bears the marginal notation at this point: “Quoted to W. S. C[hurchill].”