319. Draft Memorandum From Secretary of State Rusk to President Kennedy1

In preparation for your meeting on August 252 on the Dominican Republic, I enclose a memorandum assessing our problem there and recommending courses of action. These courses are designed to strengthen President Balaguer in his program of democratization, induce the moderate opposition, Ramfis Trujillo and the military establishment, to support Balaguer’s program and avoid violence, and assist in resolving the question of the departure of the Trujillo family and the disposition of their properties, particularly their large sugar holdings. I also enclose a memorandum summarizing action already taken or under way toward these objectives.3

Dean Rusk

Attachment

THE DOMINICAN SITUATION

I. Problem

To take action which will relieve the present tension in the Dominican Republic and will at the same time promote the basic United States objectives of (a) preventing Castro-Communism from developing or taking control, and (b) establishing a friendly and stable government as democratic as possible.

II. Discussion

Tension in the Dominican Republic is increasing. Elements of the military fear for their future and are reacting with violence to political activities, some of them provocative, by the newly emerging political [Page 662] opposition. Some of the military elements have also threatened to “turn to the left” and are reportedly favoring Castro-Communists. Ramfis appears to be weakening in his initial declared intention to control the armed forces and give Balaguer effective support. Military elements may overthrow Balaguer at any time.

If the Trujillo and military elements achieve or continue seriously to threaten a coup, the currently non-Communist opposition can be expected to reject moderate leaders and tactics, undertake widespread strikes and covert revolutionary activities, and seek alliance with Castro-Communists. They may also gain support from some of the military.

Should such a coup occur, the new regime could probably impose temporary order but would almost certainly lead to an explosion that would give the Castro-Communists ideal conditions for gaining strength and assuming power. Such a regime also could expect intense Venezuelan hostility and OAS disapproval and would be most difficult for the United States to support.

To reduce this threat, we must seek means of easing the transition for the military and other Trujillo-associated elements from the Trujillo system to a freer society. These means must be compatible, however, with our support of the Balaguer program and the moderate opposition, which represents our best hope for reaching our objectives.

These means must take into account the economic power of the Trujillos, which is a critical aspect of the problem. For example, under existing United States legislation, the Trujillos would stand to gain $28 million from the sale to the United States of their sugar under a windfall quota, which would automatically be assigned to the Dominican Republic upon resumption of diplomatic relations.

III. Recommended Courses of Action

A. Immediate

We should:

1.
Publicly and privately make clear that we support President Balaguer and his program of democratization, and where possible identify our programs as expressions of that support and of our interest in the Dominican people.
2.
Inform Ramfis Trujillo at the earliest opportunity that we (a) would view with serious concern the overthrow of Balaguer by force or intimidation; (b) urge that security and military forces seek common cause with the moderate opposition and avoid abuses against it; and (c) recommend that the military and security forces recognize that they would be certain victims of a Castro-Communist take-over and that they avoid supporting Castro-Communist elements.
3.
Take steps toward establishing a small United States military mission at field-grade level, commencing with the assignment of military liaison officers to the Consulate.
4.
Inform the moderate opposition that we (a) consider it a key factor in the future of the Dominican Republic; (b) urge it to pursue its objectives peacefully and seek a constructive relationship with the military; and (c) urge it to exclude rigorously and oppose Castro-Communists.
5.
Informally assist the Balaguer Government in contracting for, or through the OAS, a police mission to improve the attitudes and methods (especially in intelligence techniques and crowd control) of the security forces.
6.
Once President Balaguer has made a request, urge and assist voluntary relief agencies to make the necessary survey leading to a PL 480 food distribution program for needy Dominicans.
7.
Move in the OAS to remove sanctions on petroleum, trucks, and spare parts.
8.
In order to induce the Trujillos to relinquish power and, in some cases, leave the country in a constructive manner, with their self-respect and some small part of their holdings within the Dominican Republic, obtain their consent in principle to the establishment of a foundation which would take over the bulk of their holdings (including all sugar properties) within the Dominican Republic and administer them for the benefit of the Dominican people. Once consent is obtained, have a qualified U.S. lawyer and an economist work out the details.
9.
Persuade Balaguer to agree to a statement, and Ramfis to support it, (a) expressing the intention to continue the democratization program; (b) offering the moderate opposition representation in the government; (c) eliminating the PD assessment on salaries; and (d) announcing the Trujillos’ agreement to a foundation.
10.
Seek Venezuelan support for or acquiescence in our plans, emphasizing the divestment of the Trujillos of their properties.

B. Subsequent

Following on the above actions, we should:

11.
Move for the return of the OAS Sub-Committee to receive the declaration outlined in paragraph 9.
12.
Move in the COAS for the rescission of Resolution 1 of the VI MFM, i.e., for the restoration of diplomatic relations.

  1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, 739.00/8-2461. Secret. Drafted by Coerr and Crimmins. Marginal notations indicate that this document was to be revised; however no later version was found.
  2. The meeting, in fact, took place August 28; see Document 320.
  3. Not found.