893.113/278: Telegram

The Secretary of State to the Ambassador in Great Britain (Harvey)

157. Your 220, May 24, 6 p.m.64

This Government is deeply gratified to note the ready acceptance on the part of the British Government of the proposal made by this Government in connection with the construction of naval vessels, arsenals and dockyards by the Chinese Government. The Italian and Japanese Governments have also given their adherence to the policy proposed and their assurance in this regard, as well as that of the British Government, has been telegraphed to the American Ambassador at Paris for the information of the French Government. Brief summaries of the Japanese and Italian Governments’ replies will be telegraphed you from Paris.

The Department also notes with satisfaction that the British Government, as stated in the first paragraph of its note, desires the so-called Chinese Arms Embargo placed on a more satisfactory basis. In this connection the Department desires the British Government to know that the Italian Government, in reply to representations from this Government, has abandoned its reservation to the arms declaration signed at Peking on May 5, 1919, and has given its assurance that no sales of Italian arms and ammunition shall take place in China either to Chinese buyers or to their agents of whatsoever nationality and that no more deliveries will be made under contracts entered into either before or after May 5, 1919. The British Government will recall that at the Conference on the Limitation of Armament an effort was made to strengthen the existing declaration, but that the Italian delegates were not then prepared to [Page 730] adopt the resolution which was offered and which as finally amended reads as follows:—66

  • “I. The United States of America, Belgium, the British Empire, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, and Portugal affirm their intention to refrain from exporting to China arms or munitions of war, whether complete or in parts, and to prohibit such exportation from their territories or territories under their control, until the establishment of a government whose authority is recognized throughout the whole of China.
  • II. Each of the above powers will forthwith take such additional steps as may be necessary to make the above restrictions immediately binding.
  • III. The scope of this resolution includes all concessions and settlements in China.
  • IV. The United States of America will invite the adherence to this resolution of the other powers in treaty relations with China.”

Since the Italian Government was not then in position to adopt the resolution the Japanese Government felt compelled to make a reservation which led to the withdrawal of the resolution. Now that the Italian Government has abandoned its reservation to the existing declaration the Government of the United States, if the Italian and Japanese Governments will now accept the above resolution, contemplates seeking also the approval of the other Governments which participated in the Conference. The Japanese Government has already been informally approached on the subject, and has indicated its approval to the Department.

You will communicate the above to the British Government but in so doing will explain that, as a first step in attaining the object sought by the British Government, the Department entertains some doubt whether it would be advisable to propose at this time going beyond the terms of the resolution above mentioned. Such a proposal might make it difficult to obtain the adoption of the resolution by the other Governments which participated in the Conference. For its own part this Government finds itself limited, with respect to the control over warlike material, by the terms of the statute which prohibits only the exportation to China of “arms and munitions of war.”

Hughes
  1. Post, p. 751.
  2. Conference on the Limitation of Armament, Washington, Nov. 12, 1921–Feb. 6, 1922, in English and French (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1922), p. 1474.