S/SNSC files, lot 63 D 351, NSC 5429/4

Note to the National Security Council by the Acting Executive Secretary (Gleason)

[Extracts]

top secret
NSC 5429/4
[Page 1036]

Current U.S. Policy Toward the Far East

The NSC Planning Board has prepared, pursuant to NSC Action No. 1275–b-(12),1 the proposed statement of policy in the enclosed paragraphs marked by a double asterisk, for consideration by the Council at its meeting on December 21.

S. Everett Gleason

[Enclosure]

Draft

Statement of Policy by the National Security Council on Current U.S. Policy in the Far East

* Indicates paragraph of NSC 5429/3 revised by the Council, December 1, 1954 (NSC Action No. 1275).

** Indicates paragraph of NSC 5429/3 revision of which is recommended by the Planning Board.2

courses of action

5. In order to preserve the territorial and political integrity of the area, the United States should:

**c. Ratify the Mutual Defense Treaty with the Republic of China covering Formosa and the Pescadores, and jointly agree upon safeguards against Chinese Nationalist offensive action. Pending the ratification of such a Treaty, continue the existing unilateral arrangement to defend Formosa and the Pescadores (excluding the Nationalist-held off-shore islands). For the present, seek to preserve, through United Nations action, the status quo of the Nationalist-held off-shore islands; and, without committing U.S. forces except as militarily desirable in the event of Chinese Communist attack on Formosa and the Pescadores, provide to the Chinese Nationalist forces military equipment and training to assist them to defend such off-shore islands, using Formosa as a base. However, refrain from assisting or encouraging offensive actions against Communist China or seaborne commerce with Communist China, and restrain the Chinese Nationalists from such actions, except in response to Chinese Communist provocation judged adequate in each case by the President.

** e. Employ all feasible covert means, all feasible overt means including, in accordance with constitutional processes, the use of [Page 1037] armed force if necessary and appropriate, to prevent Indonesia or vital parts thereof from falling under Communist control by overt armed attack, subversion, economic domination, or other means.

** g. (1) Issue a directive to its armed forces that, in the event of unprovoked Communist armed attack against U.S. military or nonmilitary personnel, aircraft, or vessels outside Communist territory, U.S. forces in the area will take against the Communist attacking force immediate and aggressive protective measures, including, if feasible and desirable, pursuit of the Communist attacking force into hostile airspace or waters.

(2) In addition to the action directed in (1) above, and as specifically approved by the President, take such additional retaliatory action as may be necessary and appropriate.

* 7. In order to weaken or retard the growth of the power and influence of the Asian Communist regimes, especially Communist China, the United States should:

Majority Proposal

** c. (1) For the immediate future and pending completion of and U.S. action on the study referred to in (2) below, maintain the current U.S. export, import and financial controls on trade with Communist China, and strongly urge other free world countries to maintain their current controls on trade with Communist China and to refrain from such actions as sending trade missions to Communist China.

(2) An appropriate agency or agencies should study on an urgent basis, all aspects of U.S. economic defense policy applicable to trade with the Communist bloc (including Communist China), taking into account in such study, among other things, the matters set forth in Annex B,3 and should submit to the National Security Council at the earliest practicable date comprehensive and detailed recommendations for such revisions in such policy as may be required by national security interests, both long and short range. [Any future change in U.S. over-all economic defense policy should be premised on the concept that it is part of an over-all negotiating position which seeks to obtain an appropriate quid pro quo from any friendly, neutral, or communist country profiting from any such change.]

(3) At a time determined by the Secretary of State, if feasible after the study referred to in (2) above is completed, begin consultations, particularly with the U.K. and France, looking toward agreement with the other cooperating industrialized countries of the free world on the extent, nature, and method of controls on trade with Communist China.

[Page 1038]

State Proposal

** c. (1) Maintain the current level of United States export, import, and financial controls on trade with Communist China and administer these controls in such manner as to minimize friction with other Free World countries which might tend to lessen their active cooperation in the multilateral control program.

(2) Urge other Free World countries to maintain the current level of export controls on trade with Communist China. In aid of this effort, the U.S. should be prepared to exercise a greater degree of flexibility in handling problems of minor exceptions to the multilateral embargo.

(3) Whenever it may be determined by the Secretary of State that further effort to maintain the current multilaterally agreed level of export controls would be seriously divisive among our allies or lead nations needing trade with Communist China toward an accommodation with the Soviet bloc, the Secretary should report this determination to the Council together with his recommendations, including guiding principles for any negotiation relating to revision of the multilaterally agreed controls.

*/** d. Utilize all feasible overt and covert means, consistent with a policy of not being provocative of war, (*) to create discontent and internal divisions within each of the Communist-dominated areas of the Far East, and to impair their relations with the Soviet Union and with each other, particularly by stimulating Sino-Soviet estrangement, (*) but refrain from assisting or encouraging offensive actions against Communist China or seaborne commerce with Communist China, (**) and restrain the Chinese Nationalists from such actions, except in response to Chinese Communist provocation judged adequate in each case by the President.

  1. See footnote 7, p. 1013.
  2. All the subparagraphs marked with a double asterisk are printed here.
  3. The State Member understood that such pursuit was to be undertaken only on the specific order of the senior commander in the area. [Footnote in the source text.]
  4. Annex B, prepared by the NSC Planning Board Assistants, was transmitted to the NSC by Lay under cover of a memorandum dated Dec. 15, 1954, neither printed. Annex B to NSC 5429/4 is identical to Annex B to NSC 5429/5, p. 1068.
  5. Proposed by the Commerce and ODM representatives. [Footnote and brackets in the source text.]