740.00119PW/2–2846

The Chargé in China (Robertson) to the Secretary of State

No. 1166

Sir: I have the honor to refer to the Embassy’s telegram number 357 dated February 23, 1946 and to enclose for the information of the Department the full text of a press release with regard to recent developments in Manchuria issued at Yenan on February 14, 1946 by the spokesman of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.

The release includes a statement that there exists in Manchuria a local force of approximately 300,000 men, styled the Manchuria Joint Democratic Army, which is said to have been organized by cadres from the Communist Eighth Route and New Fourth Armies. Local Communist sources state that this Army is a loosely knit guerilla organization composed of democratic Manchurian elements interested in fostering local self-government; they also state, however, that most of the officer personnel and directing agencies are Communists. In this latter connection it is interesting to note in the release that for the first time the Communists refer to Chang Hsueh-shih, brother of Marshal Chang Hsueh-liang,57 as an Eighth Route Army general.

If the statement in the release with regard to numerical strength can be relied upon, it would indicate truly remarkable Communist expansion in Manchuria since the collapse of Japan. During the winter of 1944–45, Secretary Raymond P. Ludden, now serving at the Embassy, was informed by senior field commanders in the Shansi-Suiyuan and Shansi-Chahar-Hopei Communist Base Areas that Communist expansion into Manchuria was impossible at that time. These commanders stated that the Japanese had been in effective occupation for such an extended period and had developed the “protected village” and “pao chia” systems so extensively that Communist operations were too [Page 449] difficult. The limited areas of southwestern Liaoning and southern Jehol in which Communist units were operating at that time were for all practical purposes considered as parts of eastern Hopei.

It will be noted that the Communist release recognizes the right of the Central Government to reestablish Chinese sovereignty in Manchuria and reiterates that restrictions on troop movements under the truce agreement58 do not apply to Central Government forces proceeding to Manchuria. In general the release does not go beyond previous Communist claims for recognition of democratic local self-government in liberated areas and is not bellicose in tone. Its issuance, however, in the face of increasing nationwide expression of bewilderment at and distrust of ultimate Russian intentions in Manchuria appears to have been inept and unfortunate.

The relationship of the Manchuria Democratic Joint Army to Russian occupation forces is unknown, but the Communist release has been accepted in many quarters as evidence of Chinese Communist-Soviet collusion in Manchuria. There is no proof that such collusion exists and the Communist delegation in Chungking appears considerably chagrined with regard to reaction to it in the United States as well as China. General Chou En-lai and other Communists here appear genuinely anxious that Russian withdrawal from the northeast be effected without delay.

Any ulterior motives for the Communist press release at this time are difficult to establish and it may be related to developments in Manchuria about which the Embassy has no information, but on the surface at least it seems to be a wordy Communist restatement of their position that the establishment of a Kuomintang monopoly of power in Manchuria will be unwelcome to the Communists.

In any event the release has created widespread disapproval of and attacks on Communist policy in the democratic and liberal press as well as in Kuomintang organs. There is ample reason to believe, however, that the present obscure Manchurian situation, coupled with the Communist release, has been made use of by disgruntled rightist elements of the Kuomintang, opposed to full implementation of the resolutions adopted by the People’s Consultation Conference on January 31, 1946 and to drastic military reorganization, to inject into the scene a national security issue in order to divert attention from the urgent necessity for immediate internal reforms.

In fairness to the Communists it must be pointed out that during the past few months their willingness to cooperate with all parties and groups and their evident trust in American efforts to advise and assist [Page 450] in the solution of Chinese administrative and military problems leaves little to be desired.

Respectfully yours,

For the Chargé d’Affaires ad interim
Robert L. Smyth

Counselor of Embassy
[Enclosure]

Press Release Issued by Spokesman of Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party

Yenan, February 14, 1946:—

The spokesman of the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party made the following statement about the general conditions, armed forces and policy of the Chinese Communist Party in Manchuria when interviewed by our correspondent today:

Question: What are the present general conditions in Manchuria?

Answer: After the Red Army entered Manchuria and annihilated Japs and puppets, sovereignty over the Manchuria has been restored to China. The National Government has sent armies and officials to take over these provinces and the national disgrace of the past fourteen years has been wiped out. But owing to the fourteen years of the ruthless Jap rule people’s life in Manchuria, which were richest in natural resources and most developed in industries and mining, is hard. The industries, commerce and finance have more or less become stagnant or chaotic. The most urgent needs of the people are therefore cleaning up of remnants puppet and Jap forces and establishment of peace and order to restore and develop the economic reconstruction on the foundation of broad democracy. The key issue of this problem hinges on how Kuomintang troops and administrative officials carry out the peaceful democratic cooperation with the local population, local troops, Eighth Route Army and local popularly elected government in Manchuria according to the cease fire agreement and principles laid down by peaceful reconstruction program.

Question: What forces are there in Manchuria? What is the state of the local government?

Answer: Manchuria has always had the largest number of people’s forces in China. The people in all places of Manchuria flocked to arms to exterminate Jap and puppet troops after the Soviet Army entered Manchuria. The officers and troops of the former Anti-Japanese Joint Army were most active and swiftly grew in numbers. The troops under Chow Pao-chung, leader of the former Anti-Japanese Joint Army, have increased to several tens of thousands spread over east and north Manchuria and have formed Yang Ching-yu [Page 451] detachment and Chao Shang-chih (Yang and Chao were both Manchurian heroes fallen in the Anti-Japanese War—Edit.) detachment. The large numbers of the Eighth Route Army officers and men, guerrillas and People’s Volunteers in the North China taken prisoner by the Japanese troops have also actively joined the work of extermination Jap and puppet troops after being liberated. The troops under the Manchuria Eighth Route Army generals Chang Hsueh-shih, Lu Cheng-tsao and Wan Yi and other Eighth Route Army and New Fourth Army units ordered to march into Manchuria to exterminate Jap and puppet troops have in the course of their fighting become closely linked with the people. The Eighth Route Army troops under General Li Yun-chang who fought the Japs in Hopei–Jehol–Liaoning Border Region are now in West Liaoning. Under the leadership of these forces, the Manchurian people have organized a Manchuria Democratic Joint Army nearly three hundred thousand strong disposed in areas not garrisoned by the Soviet Army or evacuated by the Soviet Army in Manchuria. In addition, there are Peace Preservation Corps and police who are also working for mopping up of Jap and puppet troops and safeguarding local peace and order.

In the area where Jap and puppet troops have been wiped out, the local population have elected upright persons to form democratic county governments. The leadership of these troops and local governments are participated by the Chinese Communists whose organizations were long ago destroyed by the Japs and puppets, the action of the Communist members were at first not wholly unified. It was not until the arrival of Peng Chen, Chen Yun, Lin Feng, Lin Piao and Lo Yung-wheng—members of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party—that the supreme party leading organ was set up in Manchuria to connect up the local party organizations and unify the action of the party members.

At present in all places where the Chinese Communists are operating, peace and order has been or is established. The bandits have been gradually cleaned up, industry and commerce are reviving and traitors are being tried and punished. The excellent beginning in improving the livelihood and awakening the political consciousness of the people has been made through the impeaching and settling accounts with traitors by the people. Rut the bandits and remnants of the puppet forces still disturb peace and order in certain outlying places. Some Japanese whose ambitions have not been checked are still attempting to wreck peace and democracy in Manchuria and preserve their forces of aggression. The Manchurian people hate them to bone and hope that the Democratic Joint Army will swiftly clean them up so that they may again live in peace and security.

[Page 452]

Question: What is the policy of the Chinese Communist Party towards Manchuria?

Answer: Like the policy of the Chinese Communist Party for the whole country, the policy of the Chinese Communist Party towards Manchuria may be summed up in four words—peace, democracy, unity and reconstruction. The Chinese Communist Party has never been against sending of personnel by National Government to restore sovereignty over Manchuria. This has been clearly stated by the Commander-in-Chief Chu Teh on November 28th last year. The cease fire order issued by the Kuomintang and Communist Party on January 10th also formally stated that the cessation of all troops movements did not apply to sending of troops by the National Government to restore the sovereignty over Manchuria. But in order to realize peace, democracy, unity and reconstruction in Manchuria we hold that the following principles should be laid clown:

(1)
The National Government organs which are now taking over Manchuria are monopolized by the Kuomintang Party and are therefore contrary to the popular will in Manchuria and the whole country. Consequently all organizations from Generalissimo’s Administrative Headquarters and its Political Committee and Economic Committee down to the provincial governments should be reorganized. They should take in all democrats in Manchuria and all parties and groups and non-partisans within the country so that all the democratic elements will enjoy the fair and effective representation.
(2)
All Anti-Japanese Democratic Forces now in Manchuria should be recognized and reorganized so that they may jointly preserve local peace and order with troops sent there by the National Government and exterminate the puppet troops and bandits and avoid the military conflict.
(3)
All the democratic county governments in Manchuria should be recognized. If it is felt that their basis is still not broad enough, the reorganization measures should be adopted through the joint deliberation or reelections held. They should not be left unrecognized and it is advisable to replace democratic measures of the popular election by non-democratic measures of appointment.
(4)
At present China is on friendly terms with Soviet Union, civil war between the Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party has ceased. Since the local troops are helping to maintain peace and order in Manchuria, the Kuomintang forces entering Manchuria to recover the sovereignty should be restricted to stipulated strength so as to alleviate the burden of the people and be conducive to peace. The reorganization of the puppet troops in Manchuria and employment of the North China puppet armies (such as the New 27th Army under Chiang Peng-fei) to take over the sovereignty in Manchuria should be forbidden.

Question: Can above policy of the Chinese Communist Party be put into practice? What attitude has the National Government towards this policy?

[Page 453]

Answer: We believe that under the present international and domestic situation and the demands of the Manchurian people, only such a policy is correct and can be materialized. The diametrically opposed policy will inevitably be incorrect as well as impossible of realization. A grave mistake will be made if the democrats and Chinese Communists in Manchuria refuse to recognize the status of the Kuomintang in Manchuria and are unwilling to cooperate sincerely and work together with the Kuomintang for peace, democracy, unity and reconstruction. Likewise, if the Kuomintang refuses to recognize the status of the democratic forces and Chinese Communist Party in Manchuria and is willing [unwilling?] to cooperate and work sincerely with them, it would also commit a grave mistake.

The Kuomintang has in the past resorted to settling Manchurian question through use of military force. We are resolutely against such a policy. But for the sake of peaceful settlement in Manchuria, Chinese Communist-led troops have made many concessions to solve all disputes about the local government in just and democratic manner. We believe that this is also applicable to Manchuria. All in all, if overall agreement is not reached by parties concerned and military conflict thereby arises in Manchuria which occupies such important positions in the country and where such complicated conditions exist, this would be a blow to the longing for peace and democracy of the Manchurian people who have been trampled for fourteen years and the longing of the entire nation for peaceful settlement of the Manchurian question.

The Chinese Communist Party has already requested the National Government to conduct negotiations on this question. We sincerely hope the government will in accordance with the cease fire agreement and the spirit of the Political Consultation Conference enable such negotiations to be promptly conducted so as swiftly to attain the satisfactory results.

  1. The “Young Marshal” who was in charge of Manchuria in 1931 when the Japanese occupation began; detained as a result of kidnaping Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek in December 1036 at Sian.
  2. January 10, p. 126.