793.94/6958

The Minister in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State

No. 3473

Sir: I have the honor to enclose herewith a series of twenty-two memoranda65 covering conversations with responsible merchants and [Page 80] officials of the Chinese Government which I had during the period February 13th to March 15th in Shanghai, Nanking and Peiping upon my return from leave in the United States. These conversations related to the financial crisis which has developed in Shanghai and to a change which has taken place in Sino-Japanese relations. Both these questions are related in the enclosed summary. (The memorandum of a conversation which I had with Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs T’ang Yu-jen on February 23rd66 was transmitted with the Legation’s despatch No. 3420 of March 7th.67)

The Department will note from what was said to me that there has really come about a change in Sino-Japanese relations, and that it would appear that the Japanese military are the most active agents in bringing this change about, still retaining the initiative in and control of Japan’s policy toward China. The agents, self appointed or chosen to make this policy effective, are military officers with whom the regular representatives of foreign Governments cannot maintain proper contacts, not only because of the irregularity of their status, but also because the Japanese military officer maintains a studied aloofness toward all foreigners and toward all Chinese except those with whom he chooses to make contacts. The Chinese with whom the Japanese military maintain relations are generally persons of known or reputed pro-Japanese leanings, unknown to the regular channels of foreign intercourse with China. Even the names of these people are for the most part undivulged.

In having these conversations I took particular care not to evince any excessive interest in the matters discussed. I particularly refrained from direct questions, and statements were made to me entirely upon the initiative of the Chinese. I found evidence of an unwillingness on the part of responsible Chinese to be specific in this matter; there was an evident fear of revealing sources, and apparently a general desire to create in my mind the impression that no actual or responsible negotiations had taken place.

From these conversations I think it may be safely assumed:

1.
That the Japanese military, and particularly the Kwantung Army, have concluded to seek economic advantages in China by peaceful negotiation.
2.
That we may expect them to work out some trade arrangement whereby, by grant of credit and reciprocal tariff advantages, Japan will take certain Chinese products in return for Japanese-manufactured goods.
3.
That Japan will work out with the Chinese some kind of an arrangement which will include financial assistance, whereby Japanese cotton experts will be employed in the cotton-growing areas of [Page 81] North China for the purpose of improving the yield and extending the acreage of China’s cotton.
4.
That Japan will seek authority to construct a railway which will give her access to and control over the coal that is available in the province of Shansi.
5.
That Japan will obstruct any effort of China to develop any iron industry in the Yangtze Valley except under Japanese control and with Japanese assistance.
6.
That China will use every effort to do away with the boycott of Japanese goods which for such a long time has prevailed among the Chinese.

To accomplish these purposes Japan will hold over Chiang Kai-shek and his Government the threat of obtaining these ends by dealing with local authorities and thus destroying the very life blood of the Chinese Government.

Perhaps it is pertinent in this connection to add that recently the British Government, in considering a proposal made to it by the Chinese for a loan, served notice on the Chinese Government that the British Government would be prepared to consider financial aid to China at this time only in case such financial assistance were accomplished by international cooperation, and then only with the participation of Japan and contingent upon China settling differences with Japan.

As regards Soviet Russia, it is my belief that the Soviet Government is only too happy to have Japan occupied in Asia, for this will serve to postpone any threat which Japan may offer to Russian interests.

Respectfully yours,

Nelson Trusler Johnson
[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the Minister in China (Johnson)

Sino-Japanese Relations: Summary Based on Conversations, Memoranda of Which Are Attachéd68

Upon my return to China in the middle of February of this year from a vacation in the United States I found that during the four months of my absence a distinct change had occurred in Sino-Japanese relations. There was a great deal of excited discussion, not only in Japan, but also in Shanghai and Nanking, and in the Chinese press generally, of a more friendly atmosphere developing in the relations between the two countries. The discussion centered around Sino-Japanese “collaboration” in economic fields.

[Page 82]

It appeared to be the opinion of responsible Chinese with whom I talked in Shanghai and in Nanking that the initiative in this new turn of events had come from the Japanese side. Reference was made to statements which First Secretary of Legation Suma stationed in Nanking had made in the course of visits to General Chiang Kai-shek, Wang Ching-wei, Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs, Chen Kung-po, Minister of Industries, and H. H. Kung, Minister of Finance. Mr. Suma made these calls upon his return to China after a vacation in Japan, and presumably he had the latest information of the Japanese attitude learned from responsible authorities. At about the same time the Japanese Military Attaché, Suzuki, called upon responsible Chinese officials and is reported to have made statements regarding Japanese policies. During the time that I was in Shanghai and Nanking, Major General Doihara, formerly employed in China as an adviser to the Chinese Government and recently attached to the Kwantung Army, who in recent years has achieved a position of mysterious stature with a reputation for intrigue with Chinese worthy of an Oppenheim story, was making a tour of China visiting high Chinese officials North and South, after having attended in Dairen a much-publicized conference with fellow officers of the Kwantung Army.

Chinese reaction to these visitations was of two kinds. In the first place, there was expressed a general belief, on the part of those not immediately connected with the conversations, that these spokesmen of Japanese policy had delivered what amounted to an ultimatum, to the effect that the Chinese must show an immediate appreciation of Japan’s pacific and friendly attitude or take the consequences. It was said that the Chinese were given six months in which to meet what were purported to be the Japanese terms.

On the other hand, among those Chinese who seemed to be closest to the conversations in question, I could get no evidence of any demands having been presented, although all expressed a certain amount of conviction to the effect that these gentlemen had made it evident that Japan is intent upon a policy which, if successful, would in the end result in economic if not political control in China.

Speculation varied as to the reason why the Japanese military should have changed their policy in regard to China at this time. It was generally believed that the military, having accomplished all that they had intended to accomplish in Manchuria and North China, were now prepared to look at China proper, not so much from the point of view of military conquest as from the point of view of economic conquest. It was said that there was evident in Japan a certain loss of prestige on the part of the military. (That may be indicated by the fact that the Japanese Government appears to have transferred to the Kwantung [Page 83] Army in Manchuria most of those figures, such as Itagaki and Minami, who were originally involved in the Japanese adventure, thus separating them from direct control of military policy at home.)

And it was argued that, as a corollary to this loss of prestige in Japan, there was a revival of influence on the part of Japanese business and civilian leaders—particularly of Osaka merchants, all of whom have been in favor of more peaceful methods in Japan’s China policy—with a view to obtaining a return of China’s good will and a better market for Japanese goods. There seemed to be a belief that among the merchant and civilian leaders in Japan there was a growing apprehension not only regarding Japan’s internal economic situation, but also regarding the future of Japan’s much-needed foreign market for the products of her industries. It was said that the increasing handicaps placed by the United States and the British Empire and other countries upon Japanese goods are forcing Japanese industries back upon China as an outlet for their products. It was argued that the Japanese military, perceiving this trend, and anxious to retain their position of leadership in Japanese domestic politics and the direction of Japan’s policy toward China, took the initiative, thus robbing the civilian and merchant element in Japan of any prestige which such a move might give.

Another reason given for this change in the attitude of the Japanese military was that in March of this present year (1935) Japan’s resignation from membership in the League would become effective, while in December her denunciation of the Washington Treaties69 would also become effective. The Japanese military leaders were therefore anxious to clean up questions pending with China before the end of the year, and if possible face the questions that would present themselves in 1936 with a peaceful China behind them.

In all accounts that came to me of the conversations which Suma, Suzuki and Doihara had with Chinese, I gathered that they intended to convey to the Chinese that they were speaking for the Japanese Government; and I wish to say in this connection that in all conversations which I have had with Mr. Suma I have been impressed with the fact that he intends to convey the idea that he speaks for Japan. I have never heard him mention to me the activities or the statements of the Minister, who in all of these matters seems to play a very minor role if any.

From the Chinese side the reaction to these methods appears to be one of frightened acquiescence. In the first place, they feel only too poignantly their inability to meet Japanese force with force, and with [Page 84] hatred in their hearts they seek whatever means offers to placate Japanese force. On the other hand, in recent months they have been terribly reminded of the economic weakness of the Government, by the reaction of silver in the possession of Chinese to the silver-purchasing policy of the United States.

When the white metal was cheap it came in large quantities to Shanghai for investment; the security of the International Settlement tended to concentrate the silver there. Such quantities were received from abroad and the Chinese interior that it was begging for opportunities for investment. Under these conditions the Chinese Government found it easy to finance Government enterprises.

When the price of silver went up it became immediately advantageous for Shanghai merchants to use their accumulation of silver to meet obligations abroad. There was also the temptation to realize at once the profits which the rising price of silver offered to those who had bought silver when it was around twenty-four cents an ounce. The result was a flight of silver from Shanghai, and the disappearance of China’s only market for her Government securities. In other words, the Government had put too many eggs in its Shanghai basket, and it now found itself in desperate straits.

It was natural enough that in this situation the Japanese advances along more peaceful lines should be welcomed. Although it would appear that no Japanese loan has been offered, at the same time it is apparent that Japanese credit contingent upon China’s efforts to kill anti-Japanese feeling in China would be immediately available, provided that, in return for Japan’s taking more Chinese products, the Chinese would make more of their purchases from Japan.

The Chinese present two attitudes of mind: the bankers and certain members of the Government are very much opposed to a loan; but a desperate Minister of Finance, abetted by the former Minister T. V. Soong, has been making frantic efforts—the one in America and the other in England—to obtain financial assistance to tide the Government over the present crisis.

Chinese students of the situation were and are convinced that something must be done toward increasing the sale abroad of Chinese goods. They appreciate the fact that industrialized Japan offers the closest and most likely market for China’s raw materials. They are therefore prepared to meet Japanese approaches half way. But they are conscious of the fact that certain industries in China are rapidly growing in their ability to meet Chinese demand for many types of foreign products, especially those for which Japan will seek a market from her own industries. Herein will be found factors that will offer serious difficulties to both Japan and China in any efforts that they may undertake at economic collaboration. Chinese cotton is [Page 85] available in increasing quantities and in better quality for Japanese use, but it is not yet available in quantity much beyond present consumption in China, and in quality it is still below the requirements for goods of quality superior to that for which China chiefly offers a ready market. Any increase in cotton acreage must be at a sacrifice to the production of food in a country where the margin between the number of mouths to be fed and the quantity of food produced is rapidly decreasing. Japan will have to devise means of supplying food to the cotton farmers; otherwise, in the cotton growing districts we may find the need of food acting as a limitation upon the acreage available for cotton.

It is of course possible that the better organized Japanese industry, plus lower tariffs which the Japanese may force the Chinese to fix for Japanese products, may result in throttling Chinese industry, whether in cotton, silk, cosmetics, or heavy industries. It is difficult, however, to see how Japan can expect standards of living in China to increase to the point where China can offer the more expensive market which Japanese industry is beginning to require, if such a policy of throttling Chinese industry is pursued.

“Manchukuo” presents an economic problem to Japan which is going to be difficult to solve. In the first place, the large Chinese population in Manchuria will try by every means within its power to remit its earnings to the old homes in China, for Manchuria’s population is essentially connected—economically and ethnologically—with China. During the past year Japan has spent in Manchuria over 200,000,000 Yen for construction work, and during the same period Chinese labor in Manchuria has, it is reported, remitted to China something like $150,000,000. Manchuria no longer takes the products of China’s cotton mills, as was the case before 1931. It is reported that the Manchurian market for piece goods is now being supplied by Japanese-controlled mills in Shanghai, which, by some arrangement with the Japanese Government, send their products to Japan for exportation to Manchuria as Japanese products. These mills in Shanghai are understood to be controlled by Japanese textile industries in Japan, but the material and labor used in the production of the goods is Chinese, so that it is doubtful whether the Japanese textile industry benefits in this matter beyond the middleman’s profit, and the transaction certainly does not appear to offset remittances which come from Manchuria to China.

Other raw products which China might possibly furnish Japan are iron, coal and oil. China of course is anxious to develop these resources for her own use, but it remains to be seen whether she will be able to command the wherewithal at home or the necessary financing and assistance from abroad to enable her to do this, for I believe that the [Page 86] Japanese will effectively obstruct any effort of China to accomplish this purpose with the help of any one but herself, and of course this would mean that Japan would automatically obtain control over the resource in question. It is known that Japan is at the present time seeking to obtain China’s permission to build a railway either from Tangku or Tsinan for the purpose of tapping the large coal reserves of Shansi. This would give Japan an excellent supply of what is understood to be good coking coal. As regards oil, the only known supplies of this product are in Sinkiang, an area much more likely to come under Soviet control than Japanese.

N[elson] T[rusler] J[ohnson]
  1. None printed.
  2. Not printed, but see telegram No. 42, February 27, 3 p.m., p. 62.
  3. Not printed.
  4. Memoranda not printed.
  5. Meaning the treaty concerning limitation of naval armaments, signed February 6, 1922, Foreign Relations, 1922, vol. i, p. 247. For Japan’s denunciation, see note No. 250, December 29, 1984, Foreign Relations, Japan, 1931–1941, vol. i, p. 274.