711.428/1291
The Secretary of State to the Minister in Canada (Phillips)
Sir: Reference is made to your despatch No. 468, June 11, 1928,30 on the subject of the first report of the International Fisheries Commission created under Article III of the Halibut Fisheries Convention between the United States and Great Britain concluded March 2, 1923.
This Government is now prepared to conclude a convention implementing [Page 62] the recommendations contained in the report of the International Fisheries Commission. There is enclosed a draft of a proposed convention. This draft is word for word the same as the convention between the United States and Great Britain concluded at Washington March 2, 1923, excepting the portions underscored. The underscored portions of the draft denote amendments and are confined substantially to Articles I and III. Underscored alterations elsewhere in the draft are believed to be self-explanatory. The following comment is made on the alterations contained in Articles I and III:
Article I
- Paragraph 1. The closed season provided by the convention now in force will be modified by the new convention, and will begin on the first day of November in lieu of the sixteenth day, thereby increasing the closed season fifteen days; this period covers the spawning season and it is particularly desirable during this time to have the fishing areas closed.
- Paragraph 2. Under the convention now in force, the International Fisheries Commission can not modify the closed season when occasion warrants it. It can only be done by a new convention. The proposed convention gives the International Fisheries Commission authority, subject to the approval of the President of the United States and the Governor-General of Canada, to open up certain fishing areas during this period when the Commission is of the opinion that such areas could be opened without materially affecting the conservation policy.
- Paragraph 4. The International Fisheries Commission will have to carry on fishing operations for investigational purposes in order to perform efficiently its functions under the convention. The last paragraph of Article II was inserted in order to make it clear that the International Fisheries Commission is not prohibited from fishing for the purposes stated, between November 1 and February 15.
Article III
- Paragraph 1. Provision is made for the continuation of the International Fisheries Commission, both as such, and as to personnel. There is no intention to effect a change in either. Since it is probable that this convention will be of longer duration than the 1923 convention, provision is made for the filling of vacancies in the Commission membership.
- Paragraph 2. It may be stated that this paragraph comprises the core of the new convention. It contains technical provisions which are calculated to give flexibility to the administration of the halibut conservation policy adopted by the United States and Canada. The [Page 63] only practicable means of obtaining the desired flexibility is by placing the power to regulate the fishing in the International Fisheries Commission, subject to the approval of the President of the United States and the Governor-General of Canada. Identical regulations for the two countries are thus assured, and possible arbitrary action by the Commission is guarded against sufficiently by vesting approval of the Commission’s action in the executives. This paragraph authorizes the International Fisheries Commission to subdivide the area over which the convention applies for the purpose of separate treatment in administration. Regulation of the halibut fishing will differ in the subdivided areas according to the peculiar conditions of those areas. The Commission will have the authority, subject to the approval of the President and Governor-General, to close certain areas indefinitely to halibut fishing, to prevent the present use of destructive fishing gear, to license and clear vessels engaged in halibut fishing in the treaty waters, and to obtain information in regard to the catch.
The draft submitted herewith has the endorsement of the Bureau of Fisheries of this Government and the International Fisheries Commission. Moreover, the draft in its present form would seem to have fair prospect of receiving official approval of the Canadian Government, inasmuch as Mr. Found, of the Department of Marine and Fisheries of the Dominion Government, as a member of the International Fisheries Commission, has informally approved the draft.
You are instructed to transmit the enclosed draft to His Majesty’s Government in Canada for its consideration. A copy of the draft has also been sent to the Canadian Minister in Washington.
I am [etc.]
- Not printed.↩