File No. 738.3915/131.]

The American Minister to the Dominican Republic to the Secretary of State.

No. 168.]

Sir: I have the honor to enclose herewith translations of the memoranda furnished me by the Minister for Foreign Affairs containing the proposition from the Haitian Government concerning the maintenance of neutrality on the frontier, and the counter-proposition from the Dominican Government.

I have [etc.]

William W. Russell.
[Inclosure 1.—Translation.]

Proposition by the Government of Haiti.

1.
The Haitian and Dominican Governments bind themselves to observe the status quo throughout the whole length of their respective frontiers; that is to say, each party will remain in possession of the points actually occupied by it, and will not seek to disturb the other one, nor to remove the boundary marks. The two Governments bind themselves to further the negotiations concerning the frontier question and to submit themselves loyally to the arbitral decision which may be rendered.
2.
The Dominican and Haitian Governments agree and bind themselves not to encourage any revolutionary enterprise which may be started against either one of them and to mutually lend effective aid to prevent the malcontents from occupying the territory of one of the two to disturb the peace with the other; consequently, at the demand of the one of these Governments, the other shall expel from its territory every individual whose presence shall be considered dangerous.
[Inclosure 2.—Translation.]

Counterproposition of the Dominican Republic to the Proposals of Haiti.

For the purpose of maintaining the most ample and sincere cordiality of relations between the two Republics, the Haitian and Dominican Governments bind themselves to further the negotiations for a delimitation of the frontier and to submit loyally to the arbitral decision that may be given in this matter. In the meanwhile, both Governments bind themselves to take no action whatever for the purpose of changing to the prejudice of the other the positions which both Governments respectively were occupying when arbitration was selected as a means of settling their differences; and particularly as regards that section of the frontier between the south bank of Lake Fondo and the mouth of the Pedernales River; to maintain the same positions which both parties were occupying in January, 1911, and with the Government of the United States of America as mediator to submit simultaneously with the question of frontier delimitation the solution of the recent conflict on the frontier section above-mentioned.