Mr. Rockhill to Mr. Hay.

No. 59.]

Sir: I have the honor to confirm the telegrams received from and sent you on the 8th and 9th instant, respectively.

As stated in the latter, your telegrams of January 29, February 19, and March 21 seem to conflict. The first named, sent to Mr. Conger, directs that “in case of protracted disagreement over the indemnity you will propose that the matter be submitted to arbitration,” etc.; the second, also to Mr. Conger, “if an agreement for distribution should seem impracticable at Peking without great delay, suggest Hague arbitration,” and the third directs me to endeavor (1) to have the total indemnity kept within the limit of £40,000,000; (2) that it be demanded in a lump sum, proportionate distribution to be settled among the powers, and if such settlement is impossible to suggest Hague arbitration.” Your telegram of the 8th seems to include both the amount and the distribution of the indemnity in the question to be submitted to arbitration in case of disagreement; but to avoid any possible misunderstanding I deemed it prudent to ask for explicit instructions on this point.

In a circular memorandum which I sent to the various diplomatic representatives here on the 12th of March, copy of which was inclosed in my No. 52 of March 29 to the Department, I suggested that if it was found impossible to come to an agreement on the question of the distribution of the indemnity in Peking the matter should be referred to the Hague Tribunal.

I inclose herewith a copy of the declaration which I have to-day transmitted to my colleagues urging upon them the necessity of prompt settlement of the indemnity question on the lines indicated by you. This is, consequently, the third time that the United States representatives have made this proposal to the conference, and I will continue to urge it on every occasion, both in writing and orally.

I am, sir, etc.,

W. W. Rockhill.
[Page 128]
[Inclosure with dispatch No. 59.—Translation.]

Mr. Rockhill to M. Pichon.

Monsieur le Ministre: Referring to the circular letter of the 23d of March, by which the commission intrusted by the diplomatic corps with ascertaining the conditions under which the payment of indemnities which are to be demanded of China by the powers can be made, was pleased to ask of the representatives of the powers the amount of indemnity which their respective Governments proposed to ask of China, I have the honor, under instructions from my Government, and to complete the indications contained in the memorandum on this subject which I had the honor to send you on the 20th of March, to make the following declaration:

The Government of the United States desires, as it has repeatedly declared during the course of the present negotiations, to see the powers agree without further delay on a lump sum which they shall demand as an indemnity of China. As it can not be the wish of any one of the powers that this sum of money should exceed the power of China to pay, it thinks that this indemnity should not be superior to £40,000,000 sterling.

This sum once paid by China should be equitably divided among the powers proportionately to their losses and expenses, and the United States is ready to limit its demand for indemnity to an equitable fraction of this sum acceptable to the other powers.

My Government, I take the liberty of adding, is persuaded that the above-indicated solution of the question of indemnity is the only one which offers a prompt settlement, equitable and at the same time of such a nature as to prevent delays and complications equally prejudicial to all interests in the case.

I would be greatly obliged to you, Monsieur le Ministre, if you would kindly submit this communication to your colleagues on the commission and to the other representatives of the powers in Peking.

I avail myself, etc.,

W. W. Rockhill.