The Department will greatly appreciate your courtesy in forwarding a copy
of this letter at once to the Canadian authorities for their information
in connection with the promised satisfactory adjustment of the question
of canal tolls.
[Inclosure.]
Lake Carriers’
Association to Mr. Wharton.
Office of Lake Carriers’ Association,
Buffalo, N. Y., March 11, 1892.
Sir: Answering your request for figures
showing the amount of discriminating tolls exacted at the Welland
Canal during the season of 1891, I have the following figures
covering the traffic reaching the port of Ogdensburg, N. Y., by
water, via the Welland Canal, in 1891.
Total tolls paid on all traffic reaching Ogdensburg via Welland Canal
in 1891, $55,037.05. Total tolls which would have been exacted on
the same traffic had it been consigned to Montreal or any port east
of Montreal, provided it had gone through without breaking bulk or
been transferred at an intermediate Canadian port, $7,360.94. Amount
of toll collected as a discrimination against an American port,
$47,676.11.
In addition to the above, tolls to the amount of $5,719.56 were
collected on grain which reached Ogdensburg via the Welland Canal,
was there transferred and forwarded to Montreal. This grain paid
full Welland Canal tolls of 20 cents a ton, without getting the
refund. It was also refused the pass tickets ordinarily given at the
Welland Canal on traffic bound through the St. Lawrence canals,
which tickets permit free passage through the St. Lawrence Canals.
The grain in question not only paid full toll at the Welland, but
was obliged to pay full toll through the St. Lawrence Canals
also.
Total discrimination against Ogdensburg traffic for 1891,
$53,395.67.
I notice several newspaper items of late purporting to come from
Ottawa, Ontario, to the effect that the Canadian government is to
make some concessions in toll matters. These dispatches indicate,
however, that the only concessions which the authorities have in
mind is with regard to the ports of transfer. You will remember that
last year the refund on grain cargoes passing through the Welland
Canal and transferred to river barges for Montreal at some
intermediate points, was only allowed incase transshipment took
place at a Canadian port, and was refused where such transshipment
took place at an American port, like Ogdensburg. The press
dispatches indicate that the Canadian authorities will this year
permit the refund on Montreal traffic, even though the transshipment
takes place at an American port. Doubtless this will be of some
benefit to Ogdensburg, but it will leave untouched the principal
point at issue, which concerns the right of the Canadian authorities
to refund nine-tenths of the cargo tolls on Montreal traffic, while
no refund is made in the case of traffic of the same character
passing through the canal in the same direction, and bound for an
American port or route of export.
Yours, very respectfully,
C. H. Keep,
Secretary Lake Carriers’
Association.