You asked for an assessment of the situation in Haiti and the status of
our contingency planning. The attached memorandum covers both
matters.
Attachment
HAITIAN SITUATION
Duvalier continues to maintain an iron grip on Haiti. The surface
appearance that he has ameliorated the ruthlessness of his regime is
misleading—he has physically eliminated the opposition or driven it
from the country and for the time being no one is opposing him.
The general economic and social situation continues to deteriorate.
Although Haiti has maintained a reasonably sound financial
situation, there has been no significant new investment in the
country. Successive hurricane disasters over the last several years
have also adversely affected the Haitian economy. Preliminary
reports on the damage done by Hurricane Inez indicates that it has
not been too serious. We are providing emergency relief.
Our ability to assist Haiti is limited. We terminated our bilateral
economic programs in 1963 when it became obvious that Duvalier would
not permit AID to operate except
under his political control. We have continued minimal indirect
assistance ($3.3 million in FY 66) through multilateral and United
States voluntary agencies.
We have followed basically two objectives with regard to Haiti: (1)
assisting the Haitian people as much as possible without giving
direct assistance to Duvalier and (2) establishing a greater
international presence in Haiti and a greater awareness among the
American Republics of the situation there in case contingencies
should arise which would require action by the OAS or U.S.
We have tried to increase assistance through third agencies to the
extent we have considered possible without assuming unacceptable
political liabilities. We have urged Chile, Mexico, Venezuela, and
Colombia to give technical assistance. Israel and the Republic of
China are considering small technical assistance projects if ways
can be found to cover the dollar costs.
[Page 834]
The IDB is considering a $1.3 million
project to improve Haitiʼs education facilities. The loan has the
approval of all of the Latin members of the IDB Board. The project is stalled because Treasury is
reluctant to vote for the project in the IDB at the same time AID is unwilling to provide assistance on a bilateral
scale. Secretary Rusk has
discussed this loan with Secretary Fowler. I have asked State for a
memo so we can get this impasse resolved.3
Dr. Galo Plaza Lasso, ex-President of Ecuador, recently visited Haiti
and has proposed an enlarged program of technical assistance and
some capital development for Haiti to be conducted by the OAS under strict controls. Duvalier
indicated to Galo Plaza, and his Foreign Minister stated to
Secretary Rusk, that Haiti
would accept international control of the program. The Galo Plaza
plan anticipates a large OAS
presence in Haiti to be available when a major political crisis
occurs. State is staffing out this proposal and will be making
recommendations on it in the near future.
State, Defense and CIA have prepared
a comprehensive contingency plan for Haiti.4 It considers all currently anticipated
contingencies, including the employment of United States forces to
evacuate Americans and other foreign nationals from Haiti. It
includes up-to-date lists of acceptable Haitians inside and outside
Haiti who could be used in forming a new government and of U.S.
civilian and military personnel with Haitian experience who could be
mobilized to work in Haiti as we had to do during the early days of
the Dominican crisis.
We are also consulting on a regular basis with the large American
countries about conditions in Haiti, but we have not discussed
specific contingencies or possible United States and OAS reactions because such discussions
would inevitably become public knowledge.