37. Memorandum From the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs (Bundy) to President Johnson1

I attach a summary of the Vietnamese situation which I think is better than the spate of confusing cables from all and sundry that we have had in the last two or three days. At the end of this memorandum (by my staff man Cooper) two choices are offered. One is to let the political mess play itself out in its own way, and the other is to try to keep it pinned together in roughly its present form at least until March. The latter is Cooper’s choice, and it is clearly Max Taylor’s as well. It has the advantage that in March under cover of a new National Assembly meeting there could be a reconstruction of the government without Huong.

It is certainly true that if Huong goes now, the Buddhists will be more irresponsible than ever. On the other hand, it is equally clear that Huong himself does not have the authority to govern without very heavy and visible U.S. support.

The one additional thought I have is that we might make one more effort to talk sense to the Buddhists through some American that they trust. Their particular hero is Cabot Lodge, but the dangers of sending him are obvious. The only way it could be done is on the basis of a direct invitation from Max Taylor, and I have asked my brother Bill to consider [Page 84] whether the idea is sufficiently promising for us to ask Max if he would like to do it. I feel sure myself that in this context Lodge would be a team player and I would be glad to know your own feelings about this.

McG. B.

Keep Lodge out of it.2

See if you can find a way of using him.

Leave it to Taylor.

Finally, I continue to believe that a general discussion of Vietnam with Rusk and McNamara and myself is one of the two pieces of business that should be conducted before anyone goes to London.3 The other piece of business is a Middle East problem on which I will report separately. I have asked Jack Valenti to check with you on these two appointments.4

Attachment5

Memorandum From Chester L. Cooper of the National Security Council Staff to the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs (Bundy)

SUBJECT

  • Vietnam—The Present State of Play

The Situation

In General:—Political maneuvering continues between the civilians and the military, between the Buddhists and the government and between various elements within the military. Indeed the situation in Saigon, Hue and one or two other cities is so fluid and (literally) flammable that we may, at least for the moment, have lost our ability to exert any significant degree of control or influence. Meanwhile, no unusual [Page 85] VC military activity has been reported, and GVN forces report several successful operations.

Political:—The weekend’s attempt by Khanh to get Suu and Huong to resign has not yet run its course. Khanh saw Johnson today6 and insisted that both Suu and Huong had offered their resignations over the weekend (you remember that Huong denied this). Khanh claims he has made a deal with the Buddhists which involves inter alia the two chief troublemakers leaving the country. Johnson feels Khanh is encouraging the Buddhists by such dealings and may be thinking about taking over and assuming a Sihanouk-like role and posture.7 He also thinks the events of the past few days (especially the on-again, off-again pressure on Huong) indicates that the Generals are deeply divided.

Meanwhile, security forces have surrounded the Buddhist Institute in Saigon and banned all unauthorized entry. In Hue, local authorities have declared martial law, and have reportedly marked some areas where there are U.S. installations as off-limits to marchers. Press reports stated that one crowd of marchers had approached the U.S. Consulate, but all U.S. dependents have been relocated within the MACV compound. Most of the demonstrators have been orderly, but the theme of exhortations to them is anti-government and anti-Ambassador Taylor. The homes of the Vietnamese information director and of the local national police director were burned by students. A general strike in both Da Nang and Quang Tri, a sit-down strike in Nha Trang, and demonstrations in Hoi An, capital of Quang Nam Province are also underway.

More than 200 arrests have been made, including a number of monks. The government claims that some monks arrested have not been bona fide. Meanwhile, the Buddhists over the weekend called for further sacrifices, similar to that of the first monk last year to commit self-immolation. There are press reports indicating that some of the five monks on a hunger-strike may be in poor condition, but they are unidentified. However, government officials had a rumor that Tri Quang hoped to make Tam Chau, already frail, a martyr by allowing his death. A bonze-ess has burned herself to death in Nha Trang, and a Catholic was set on fire by a Buddhist in Saigon.

A State Department outgoing cable over the weekend8 suggested that the Buddhist problem might be defused, and a Khanh-Buddhist cabal, if any, curbed if Huong undertook a course of action which would [Page 86] maintain a firm posture against disorders, but simultaneously issue a policy statement guaranteeing freedom of religion and offering to meet Buddhist leaders and resolve any legitimate grievances. It was felt that this might undercut any developing Buddhist support. Huong, however, continues to indicate a preference for firm measures, isolating the Buddhist leaders by trying to separate sects from the United Buddhist Organization, and publicly attacking the Buddhists as tools of the Communists. No reply has as yet been received from Saigon.

Military Situation

The VC has ordered a cease-fire for the period of the New Year (31 January through 6 February); unarmed “rebel” (ARVN) forces will be permitted to go through VC lines to visit their families. However, there are reports that military activities in the Saigon area are to be stepped up in the days immediately preceding the New Year. The detonations in the MACV compound yesterday (no casualties) may have been in response to this order. In general, however, VC activity during the past week was at a relatively low level.

The ARVN has been active during the past week or so. There was a very successful operation in the Delta which netted 51 VC killed and 26 PWs. Two other operations, both south of Saigon, were described by MACV as “highly successful”.9

Evacuation

Johnson approached Huong and Deputy Prime Minister Vien on the evacuation issue.10 They expressed concern over the effects on SVN morale, but agreed to think the matter over, especially in the light of possible compensating military reinforcements. Bill Bundy’s sounding of the Australians here was inconclusive; the Ambassador felt the effect would depend on future U.S. policy and operational moves.11

In line with our conversation on Sunday,12 I am urging State to query nearby Far East posts on available school facilities. I am also looking into the question of AID establishing a special boarding school nearby (perhaps moving the school now in Saigon). We have not yet received a breakdown of dependents, but preliminary data indicate that about 60% are children.

Outgoing to Saigon today gives DOD OK to Hawk battalion for Saigon, and puts evacuation in context of “if and when”.13

[Page 87]

Infiltration

The edited, updated infiltration study was given to relevant Congressional Committees yesterday;14 Saigon gave a backgrounder today (preliminary reports indicate no static; questions mostly technical);15 Bill Bundy and I are backgrounding late this afternoon.16

Outlook

We have two broad options:

A.
Let the situation continue to slip and slide, use our presently limited assets to influence, guide and protest, and hope that the forces involved will reach some modus vivendi.
B.
Take a more active role in a last effort to get a fix that will last at least until the National Assembly meets in March (at which time Huong can be replaced with some measure of legality).

I favor the latter in full recognition that it is easier said than done and that it may mean difficulties with Taylor, State and sundry others. I will have some specific, if far-out, ideas by noon tomorrow.

C
  1. Source: Johnson Library, National Security File, Country File, Vietnam, Vol. XXVI, Memos. No classification marking.
  2. None of the three options is initialed or marked in any way.
  3. Reference is to the U.S. delegation to the funeral of Winston Churchill, who died on January 24.
  4. Not further identified.
  5. Secret.
  6. Johnson reported on this conversation in telegram 2292 from Saigon, January 26. (Department of State, Central Files, POL 27 VIET S)6
  7. The word “(neutralist)” is written in the margin of the source text at this point.
  8. Telegram 1521 to Saigon, January 22. (Department of State, Central Files, POL 15 VIET S)
  9. Not further identified.
  10. See Document 34 and footnote 4 thereto.
  11. William Bundy described the Australian Government’s response to evacuation of U.S. dependents in a January 25 memorandum to Rusk, McNamara, McCone, and McGeorge Bundy as “lukewarm, but not really striking weight one way or the other.” (Department of State, Bundy Files: Lot 85 D 240, WPB Chron. Jan.-Mar. 1965)
  12. January 24.
  13. See Document 35.
  14. See footnote 7, Document 9.
  15. No report on the January 26 Saigon background press briefing has been found.
  16. The Washington background briefing by Cooper and William Bundy was summarized in telegram 1540 to Saigon, January 26. (Department of State, Central Files, POL 27 VIET S)