463. Telegram 1533 to Geneva1

[Facsimile Page 1]

1533. For Johnson.

Guidance for January 25 meeting.

1.
Concur your proposal only to review and reiterate U.S. position on renunciation of force. Department’s press release January 21 (Deptel 1524) affords guide line for your presentation.
2.
You should not take any initiative to rephrase or reposition self-defense clause so as to set it apart from reference to Taiwan area but you can make clear that its location is not designed to estop the [Typeset Page 683] Chinese Communists from pursuit of their policies by peaceful means with respect to Taiwan.
3.
Renew demand that Communists make good on their undertaking to release Americans expeditiously. Reiterate no Chinese being prevented from leaving U.S., no case of Chinese claiming he being obstructed has been brought to Department’s attention by Indian Embassy, no response received to Department’s public statement December 16 asking anyone who knew of Chinese being obstructed to communicate at once with Department or Indian Embassy. Chinese in U.S. completely free to write to relatives on mainland China if they wish. No U.S. responsibility for fact that some fail to write. FYI [Facsimile Page 2] Department investigating case of Yuan Jui-hsiang (Your 1365), alleged by Wang to have been taken into custody by U.S. Immigration Service. Will take some time since Immigration does not maintain central files individual cases and must query each immigration district office. May be impossible trace if name given by Wang differs radically from spelling used by individual himself. END FYI.
4.
Contrast U.S. performance with Communist refusal so far fulfill their commitment and emphasize Communist non-fulfillment would cast doubt on dependability of their pledged word.
5.
Point out that responsibility for dragging out of talks lies with Communists, who not only fail to carry out their pledge of September 10 but also refuse to accept reasonable U.S. proposal for renunciation of force by both sides which would remove threat of war in Taiwan area and permit constructive discussion other practical matters at issue.
Dulles
  1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, 611.93/1–2356. Secret; Priority; Limited Distribution. Drafted by Clough and McConaughy; cleared by Dulles, Phleger, and Sebald.