795.00/4–1853: Telegram
The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Bohlen) to the Department of State
niact
1491. There will almost certainly be opportunity to raise with Voroshilov2 following presentation points mentioned in Department’s 780, April 18 [17].3 If, as is possible, Voroshilov would indicate that this falls within competence Molotov, will seek early interview with latter. (Fact that Soviet press as reported published full and accurate translation of Harrison letter without critical or other comment would appear to indicate that main positions outlined therein are not regarded as unacceptable basis.)
While I appreciate weekend and shortness of time may make this difficult, it should be helpful if I could have Department’s views on attitude I should take in event that Voroshilov, or subsequently Molotov, raise any questions such as (a) whether we insist on Switzerland as neutral nation or whether we have others in mind which might be equally acceptable, and (b) on paragraph C–3 the clarification of meaning of “peaceable disposition” of those remaining in its custody. I take this to mean those prisoners who refuse repatriations offer and “disposition” hence means resettlement and release and not repatriation in any form.
I would not raise these points of detail unless they were brought up by Soviet official but in latter event might be helpful if Soviet Government could be given clear indication of our position.
Should Voroshilov or Molotov raise any questions regarding political discussions on post-armistice question, I will merely listen and report.