Secretary’s Memoranda of Conversation, lot 64 D 199

Memorandum of Conversation, by the Acting Director of the Office of Western European Affairs (Knight)

secret

Subject:

  • Indochina

Participants:

  • The Secretary
  • Mr. Ridgway B. Knight, WE
  • M. Mendes-France1

[Here follows a brief account of discussion regarding the possibility of a meeting between the leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, with the leaders of the Soviet Union.]

The Secretary expressed the deep interest of the United States in Indochina and pointed to the great importance both to France and the entire Free World of a successful outcome to this painful and long-drawn-out war, which had not only constituted a hemorrhage for France but had been a source of much of the reluctance with which the French people considered the EDC and their association with Germany therein. It seems, however, that for the first time the elements are now assembled which should permit defeating the enemy’s organized resistance and perhaps more important than the reinforcement to the fighting forces in Indochina and the stepped-up program for the armies of the Associated States is the farsighted decision made by the French Government to grant independence to the Associated States. This should remove the mask from the Viet Minh and reveal it as the instrument of international Communism which it is. Referring to the possibility of increased Chinese support for the Viet Minh, the Secretary said that of course no one could forecast what the decision of the Communist masters would be but that he considered that under the circumstances there was just as much reason for a decision to cease hostilities as to step them up. The Secretary referred to his St. Louis speech and told M. Mendes-France that in his opening statement before the General Assembly2 he would call in vigorous terms for a cessation of Communist aggression in Indochina as a proof of Soviet peaceful intentions. Finally the Secretary said that he would not be surprised, in view of the probably advanced state of preparations and planning [Page 797] of the Viet Minh, should the fighting season in Indochina start badly and the Viet Minh score some initial successes during October.

The Secretary fully covered the impossibility of negotiating from weakness which could only turn into a Communist triumph and the necessity of building a situation of strength before one could think of negotiations with any possibility of success.

M. Mendes-France expressed his appreciation for the Secretary’s views in the matter of Indochina. He stated his sincere hope that the current program being discussed between France and the US would succeed and made the point that he had never favored immediate negotiations. He did however express the personal opinion which he had had for a long time that a continuation of a stalemate in Indochina as a running sore in France’s side with its resulting effect on EDC and the entire Atlantic alliance might conceivably best suit the Soviets. Otherwise he said, how can one explain that the Viet Minh in 1949–50 did not receive the necessary assistance to clinch victory when it was well within its grasp. Commenting on the possibility of reverses in October, M. Mendes-France expressed grave fears about their effect on French public opinion.

(Subsequently in talking to Mr. Knight, M. Mendes-France expanded at length on this point. M. Mendes-France believes that the “LanielNavarre program” goes directly counter to the desire of the vast majority of Frenchmen to see an end of the Indochina war, that this program will only be tolerated as long as it offers the possibility of success, and that any noteworthy reverses could therefore cause a popular “explosion”, in front of which the French Government would probably be powerless. For this reason M. Mendes-France attaches the greatest significance to initial success for the forces of General Navarre.)

M. Mendes-France concluded by saying that in his opinion the difficulties of the French nation were primarily mental “which perhaps makes the situation worse as those are the illnesses most difficult to cure”.

(Developing this thought later with Mr. Knight, M. Mendes-France stressed the deeply ingrained contradiction in the French mind between steadily increasing impatience over the present political situation in France and the reluctance to take any steps which might affect the vested interests of all categories of Frenchmen. He also spoke at length about the essential need for France to put her own house in order, and the resulting need for sacrifices on the part of all Frenchmen as the only means of so doing, and finally of their unwillingness to make these sacrifices as long as they had the impression that these would be wasted. He seemed to be groping for new formulas to solve these various problems but not yet to have found them.)

  1. Pierre Mendès-France, a leader of the French Radical Socialist Party, was on visit in the United States.
  2. See editorial note, p. 809.