761.5622/9–650: Telegram
The Ambassador in the Soviet Union (Kirk) to the Secretary of State
niact
[Received September 6—11:18 a. m.]
622. Eyes only for Secretary. At his request I called on Vishinsky at 1 p. m. (Moscow time) today. He opened by referring to statement made by US Representative Security Council September 5 on Soviet plane incident off Korea September 4,1 describing it as incorrect.
He then read me via interpreter Soviet note to US Government, in substance alleging Soviet plane unarmed training mission 140 kilometers distant Korean coastline. Presentation followed in reverse our note April 18 Baltic plane,2 demanded investigation indemnification punishment those responsible.
I replied as follows:
“The information at my disposal indicates that the question to which you refer pertains to defensive action by United Nations Forces operating in the Korean area in accordance with resolutions of the United Nations Security Council and that it has, in fact, been brought to the attention of the Security Council for appropriate consideration. I am therefore not in a position to accept on behalf of the United States Government the communication of the Soviet Government on this subject. It would appear to be appropriate for any representations on this question to be presented to the United Nations Security Council.”
During further half hour Vishinsky attempted persuade me accept note using various arguments. I consistently adhered position subject matter under UN competence in Security Council where Soviets should make their representations. Details later.