795.56/5–1950: Telegram
The Acting Secretary of State to the Embassy in Korea
505. In connection consideration by interested agencies of Mission’s request that combat aircraft (F–51 type) be made available for transfer ROK, Dept desires answers fol questions:
- 1)
- How is it intended provide maintenance and other ground facilities necessary to keep such planes operational? How wld initial expense such installations be met?
- 2)
- How is it intended meet continuing expense of support of such aircraft (avgas, spare parts, etc.) for FY 1951 and thereafter, including internal financing? (No provision such requirements included FY 1951 MDAP.)
- 3)
- How is it intended provide adequately trained Korean air and ground personnel, especially mechanics?
In preparing answers foregoing questions it suggested Mission investigate extent to which FEAF facilities cld by utilized to provide servicing and maintenance (periodic engine overhaul for example), equipment and spare parts, and technical training for Korean air and ground personnel.
Although Dept appreciates Mission not advocating estab modern air force for ROK, it nevertheless true that support even small force obsolescent fighters wld require considerable outlay in specialized equipment and trained personnel, none of which Dept understands to be presently available in Korea, as well as considerable continuing financial burden if such force is to be kept operational.