694.0031/8–1347

Memorandum by Mr. Charles E. Saltzman, Special Assistant to the Secretary of State, to the United States Member of the Far Eastern Commission (McCoy)

confidential

In accordance with a memorandum dated August 13, 1947, from the State–War–Navy Coordinating Committee, there is enclosed a statement of United States Policy with respect to the Restoration of Private Trade with Japan, comprising the Conclusions of SWNCC 373/1 which was approved by the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee on August 12, 1947.

The United States Member is requested to submit the statement of United States Policy to the Far Eastern Commission with a view to obtaining from the Commission a policy decision on the subject and is authorized to permit any such modifications as do not change its meaning and substance.

The United States Member is informed that paragraphs 2, 4, and 5 of the statement of United States Policy are compatible with the views of the Department of State. He is advised not to press for their approval if it appears that obtaining acceptance of these points would delay passage by the Far Eastern Commission of the remainder of the statement of United States Policy.

Philander P. Claxton, Jr.

for
Charles E. Saltzman
[Page 281]
[Annex]

Statement of United States Policy With Respect to Restoration of Private Trade With Japan

confidential

I. Long-Range Policy Objectives

1. To foster the development of conditions in Japan which will contribute to the expansion and balanced growth of international private trade.

2. To promote the reduction of trade barriers and the progressive elimination of all forms of discriminatory treatment in international commerce.

3. To encourage an increase in Japanese exports, compatible with occupational objectives, in order that these exports may, as soon as possible, pay for the imports required for the prevention of disease and unrest within Japan, and the reestablishment of a self-sustaining Japanese economy; and, in order that Japan may provide goods required throughout the world—particularly in areas which have suffered deprivation as a result of Japanese aggression.

II. Adherence to Draft Charter for an International Trade Organization

4. Japan’s foreign trade should be conducted in a non-discriminatory manner with respect to all purchases and sales and with respect to all persons or nations participating in, or affected by such trade. Controls over Japan’s foreign trade, deemed necessary during the transitional phase, should be administered in accordance with the relevant principles of the Draft Charter for an International Trade Organization55 embodied in the Report of the Drafting Committee of the Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment (issued by the United Nations Economic and Social Council March 5, 1947, at Lake Success, New York, with the identification E/TC/T/34), and every effort should be made to secure the removal of such controls as soon as conditions giving rise to them have ceased.

In adopting [adapting?] draft charter principles to problems peculiar to Japan, emphasis should be placed upon specific charter principles barring trade restriction and discriminations, rather than upon [Page 282] its permitted exceptions which are designed in the main, to cover emergency and temporary situations.

5. The following principles of the draft Charter are considered to be particularly relevant: Those principles concerning the elimination of quantitative restrictions (Articles 25, 26 and 27), exchange arrangements (Article 29), subsidies (Article 30), and state trading (Article 31).

III. Entry of Private Businessmen

6. On and after August 15, 1947, the following categories of businessmen should be permitted entry into Japan:

a.
Merchants and other traders who are prepared to purchase or to make arrangements for future purchases of potential exports, or to provide raw materials or other commodities which Japan must import.
b.
Representatives of banks, insurance companies, airlines, and shipping companies who are prepared to render necessary services in connection with Japan’s foreign trade either to private non-Japanese businessmen, to the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers or to Japanese persons or agencies approved by him.
c.
Representatives of companies or individuals with substantial prewar property interests in Japan, particularly representatives of property owners who cannot make satisfactory provision through the use of powers-of-attorney to relieve SCAP of custodial responsibility.

7. In the initial stages permission to enter Japan should be granted only to those whose business activities can be expected to contribute to the fulfillment of Japan’s export and import programs and to the achievement of the objectives of the occupation sufficiently to justify the burden which their presence will impose on Japan’s domestic economy and on the occupying forces.

8. If the number of businessmen who can qualify to enter Japan are, in the initial stages, greater than the number that can be accommodated in Japan, the distribution of entry permits should be in accordance with country quotas established on the recommendation of the Inter-Allied Trade Board. Such quotas should be established with due regard to such factors as relative prewar commercial interests in Japan and the current situation as to potential markets for Japanese exports and sources of imports. Within established quotas each country should be expected to recommend those of its nationals desiring to enter Japan who should be given priority of entry. However, such recommendations should not affect SCAP’s right to grant or withhold permission to enter or to remain in Japan on an individual case-by-case basis. Entry of private traders under a quota system will not affect the arrangements for entry of such government officials or representatives of semi-governmental trading organizations as may be required to facilitate trade between Japan and such country. The number of such representatives to be admitted for such trading [Page 283] should continue to be a matter of mutual agreement between SCAP and the country concerned.

9. There should be no discrimination on grounds of nationality against any foreign businessman admitted to Japan, and all should be accorded equality of opportunity to transact business and obtain available accommodations.

IV. Methods of Conducting Business in Japan

10. Occupation policy should oppose excessive concentration of economic power in Japan. To this end, businessmen admitted to Japan should be encouraged to operate so as to enlarge the number of Japanese firms engaged in foreign trade. Any limitations or controls on the participation of Japanese firms in foreign trade should be based upon criteria established by or under the supervision of SCAP and should operate only to the extent required to meet the objectives of the occupation. The fostering of monoply by any agency of the Japanese Government participating in foreign trade should be prevented. Contracts between Japanese and foreign businessmen should not result in undue restrictions on the flow of international trade. The distribution of export and import licenses should be on a fair and equitable basis.

V. General

11. Trading should be continued—during the transitional period, as may be necessary in the interest of maximizing export proceeds—by the Japanese Government and through the medium of governmental agencies with some areas and in some commodities. In so far as possible, Japanese governmental trading through the medium of governmental agencies and private trading should not overlap for the same commodity in the same market.

12. The Japanese Government should be encouraged to take an increasing responsibility and initiative for planning of foreign trade, subject to necessary SCAP controls.

13. A commercial exchange rate for the yen should be established as soon as practicable.

  1. Text of proposed Charter was released by the Department of State on December 30, 1946; for summary, see Department of State Bulletin, January 12, 1947, pp. 69–73, and for discussion, see ibid., February 16, 1947, pp. 271–274.