These plants are strictly peace-time concerns. We made the following
observations:
It would appear that all these removals were in complete violation of
all efforts to maintain “non-war potential” industries in Germany.
The effect of the removals will be the complete destruction of
employment opportunities in the area.
What we saw amounts to organized vandalism directed not alone against
Germany, but against the U. S. forces of occupation. Incidentally,
under the techniques used, Russia will withdraw two to three times
as much from any area as would be withdrawn by the U. S. or U. K.
under similar circumstances. In the area which we captured and
turned over to the Russians we made no removals except for a few
samples of unique equipment.
You may draw your own conclusions.
[Attachment]
[Babelsberg,] July 27,
1945.
Factory Equipment Removals
From the American Zone of Berlin2
Area Covered
On July 26 the Reparations Mission Staff, headed by Edwin W. Pauley and Isador Lubin, accompanied during
part of the trip by Will Clayton and others, visited five industrial
plants in the American sector of Berlin under the guidance of
Major Gentle of the
U. S. Military Government. The plants were in Zehlendorf and
Tempelhof, in the U. S. sector of Berlin.
Specific Plant
Observations
The three plants most carefully inspected were the artificial
fibre plant of the Spinnstofffabrik Zehlendorf A. G., the Zeiss
Ikon lens and adding machine plant, and the glass works of the
Sendlinger Optische Glaswerke. These were selected because they
are among the largest plants of the area and are peace-time
industries rather than war
plants, though their products were used by the military during
the war.
[Page 890]
The following paragraphs will give a brief view of the facts:
1. Spinnstofffabrik Zehlendorf A. G.
Normal products: Artificial wool and silk, from wood pulp.
War products: Same
Plant: About 770,000 sq. feet, mostly one story. About one half
built during the war and
equipped with new machinery. War
damage at end was 20% to buildings and to machinery practically
none.
Employees: At end about 2,000 of whom 300 were foreign “slave
labor” and were reported by the superintendent to be “just as
good as the Germans”.
Removals: 80% of all machinery removed, including all modern
equipment; conveyor systems; 2 modern steam turbines, 12,000
KWH; pumping equipment from 7 deep wells (leaving 2); all
specifications and process records; 4 technicians.
2. Zeiss Ikon A. G. Goertzwerke
Normal products: Cameras, adding-machines
War products: Optical devices
Plant: 270,000 sq. feet, modern 5 story concrete reinforced.
War damage, buildings 50%,
machinery 5%
Employees: 2,300 including about 300 “slave labor”
Equipment removed: 95% of machine tools, some 1800; all
locomotive and rolling stock; all technical reports, drawings
and specifications; several technicians went to Russia with the
machinery.
3. Sendlinger Optische Glaswerke GmbH.
Normal products: Raw glassware for illumination, Röntgen glass,
lenses, magnifying glasses, condensers, raw glass for
optics.
War products: Same, with emphasis
on raw glass and lenses for optical instruments.
Plant: 117,700 square feet, modern 5 story main plant; war damage to buildings 25%, to
machinery none.
Employees: 420, about 25% “slave labor”
Removals: All machinery except 14 old machines removed since
Armistice, kilns and furnaces remain. Some plumbing, electrical
fixtures are missing. All measuring machines taken.
In addition two International Telephone and Telegraph plants were
visited. They manufactured telephones, pneumatic conveyors,
radios and other electric equipment.
General Observations
- 1.
- These were not “war potential” plants.
- 2.
- These plants were in full operation up to May 1945.
Several of the plants had been damaged during the war mostly by fire, but were
repaired and brought to 100% production or more in 30 to 90
days. Some I. T. & T.
machinery had been moved out into plants in Czechoslovakia,
otherwise there was no evidence of “dispersal.”
- 3.
- Managers or superintendents reported that all plants were
operated as parts of various cartels, though they could not
give all details.
- 4.
- “Slave labor” made up around 20% of the labor force,
somewhat less than we found in heavy industry. Foreign labor
was highly regarded by the superintendents we talked
with.
- 5.
- Superintendents said that the bulk of their former labor
force is still available in the neighborhood, though their
living accommodations are very crowded. Present employment
is 7% to 10% of normal, and is engaged in repair and
clean-up work.
- 6.
- Raw materials and semi-finished materials on hand in the
plants are very limited or non-existent, in contrast to the
stock-piles in the steel plants. This may be an indication
of the breakdown in transport toward the end of the war.
- 7.
- Virtually all useful machinery, including some boilers,
turbines, generators and pumps were removed as well as
plumbing and electrical fixtures.
- 8.
- Removals were executed by Russian military personnel under
some technical supervision. Some 100 men were employed in
removals, which may be compared with the 2000 normal
employees of the plant. Removals continued up to the time we
took over physically. Some machinery, taken from place, was
left behind for lack of transport.
- 9.
- The removed machinery was carefully numbered and addressed
and apparently sent to places selected in advance, to be set
up on the former pattern.
- 10.
- Superintendents reported that the high precision and
measuring machinery was not properly protected and was
allowed to stand outdoors and along the streets and roads
after removal.
- 11.
- German technicians were taken with the machinery to assist
in its installation and operation. These technicians went
voluntarily, according to the superintendents, though they
implied that various “strong inducements” were offered. The
Russians wanted many more, but could not persuade them to
go.
- 12.
- Two of the plants belonged 94% and 100% to the I. T. & T. Co. They were
completely “looted”. They had been more seriously damaged
than the other plants we visited, but most of their
machinery was in good condition at the end of
fighting.
Conclusions
- 1.
- The USSR considers all industrial equipment as war booty, including the
equipment of plants engaged in making textiles, cameras,
optical instruments, radios, telephones, switchboards and
pneumatic tubes and conveyors.
- 2.
- Removals are systematic and in some cases supervised by
technical personnel. Machinery is numbered and addressed to
places selected in advance. (This conflicts with some
evidence seen at the
[Page 892]
freight marshalling yards. Practices may differ for
general purpose machinery). Technical personnel is persuaded
but not forced to accompany the machinery.
- 3.
- Special effort was made to strip the Zone turned over to
us in Berlin before we came in. The I. T. & T. in our Zone
was stripped before July 4, while the AEG (General Electric)
plant in the Russian Zone is only now being stripped.
- 4.
- There will be serious industrial unemployment no matter
what we do in our Berlin Zone, because the tools of the
former peace-time industries are gone.