793.94/2697: Telegram

The Minister in China (Johnson) to the Secretary of State

944. [From Engert.] Following has been received from the Minister at Nanking for transmission to the Department:

“November 15, 3 p.m. Please send following to Department:

  • ‘1. I find no evidence in any of the reports reaching me from Tientsin, Mukden, Harbin or Tsitsihar, of any intention on the part of the Japanese to withdraw from the stand which they have taken in Manchuria.
  • 2. On the contrary, all information reaching me up to the present indicates that the Japanese are continuing their efforts, evidently studied, completely to destroy the prestige of Chang Hsueh-liang (and this means that [of] the Nanking Government with which he has closely cooperated) in Manchuria. These efforts now extend to the ousting of representatives of his control in Tsitsihar and Tientsin.
  • 3. So thorough has this effort of the Japanese been that I am convinced that it would be impossible for Chang Hsueh-liang to reestablish his control of Manchuria either by himself or with outside aid. This applies equally to the establishment of the authority of the Nanking Government for it has no one to put in Chang’s place.
  • 4. All of which lends color to the growing belief that Japan intends to create a situation in Manchuria which will make it possible for the setting up of a puppet government, nominally independent but actually under and subservient to Japanese control similar to that which Soviet Russia has established in Mongolia.
  • 5. Chinese people looked upon Manchuria as part of China. Even C. C. Wu and Eugene Chen,26 with whom I talked in Shanghai, and who expressed themselves as believing that direct negotiations and a settlement with Japan were possible, insisted vehemently that China could never concede Manchuria to Japan nor could a Chinese Government ever concede the validity of the 1915 treaties.
  • 6. It is therefore difficult here to see how League can find a settlement of the issues between China and Japan that will be a settlement and at the same time satisfactory to both.
  • 7. I find an increasing feeling of pessimism over the situation here.
  • 8. China has placed all of her reliance upon League action. What [Page 452] will happen when the League fails to provide a solution of the problem satisfactory to the Chinese is a matter for pessimistic speculation. It is generally felt here that the authorities cannot much longer hold the people in check. The prestige of the Government is suffering and it is generally believed that when it is realized that the League can do nothing to stop Japanese aggression the people will take matters into their own hands. I am convinced that this will result in chaotical conditions throughout the whole country.
  • 9. I assume that there is no way of bringing home to the Japanese Government a sense of their responsibility for such a situation so fraught with danger to the interests of everyone.[’]”

Repeated to commander in chief.

[For the Minister:]
Engert
  1. Cantonese Minister for Foreign Affairs.