File No. 865.012/5

Chargé Jay to the Secretary of State

No. 504

Sir: In reference to previous correspondence with regard to the military service cases of Enrico Ajello and Frank Ghiloni, I have the honor to transmit herewith translation of a Foreign Office note received today concerning both of these cases, from which it will be seen that the Minister of War reaffirms his prior decisions in cases of this nature.

His decision seems to be based upon the fact that the provisions of the law of June 13, 1912, No. 555 (this is the law promulgated June 30, 1912), are not retroactive and can not be availed of by those who became liable to military service prior to the enactment thereof.

It will be noticed that the note states that Enrico Ajello has already left Italy.

I have [etc.]

Peter S. Jay
[Inclosure—Translation]

The Ministry for Foreign Affairs to Ambassador Page

Mr. Ambassador: The Royal Minister of War has examined with the greatest possible attention the note No. 1019 of February 21 last in which your excellency has so insistently sought the release from his military obligations in [Page 420] Italy of Enrico Ajello, and the Minister regrets to say that he can only confirm the previous decision of the military authorities in this case.

Ajello was born, according to our laws, as a real, true and bona fide Italian, and as the son of an Italian citizen. He became a foreigner during his minority by reason of his father’s naturalization; but upon reaching the 20th year of his age, although at that time a foreigner, he became liable to the performance of his full military obligations, in accordance with the terms of Article 12 of our Civil Code, at that time in force but since then abrogated, which military obligations, it should be added, have up to this time been unfulfilled upon Ajello’s part.

To this principle the Royal Ministry of War has never made nor has it the power to make any exceptions, and even in the case of Francesco Ghiloni, cited by your excellency, which is perfectly analogous to that of Ajello, his release was denied for the same reasons noted above.

It is of no avail to claim that Ajello had selected American citizenship, for the reason that the provisions of the law of June 13, 1912, No. 555, are not retroactive. Therefore Ajello, having become liable for the performance of his military obligations ten years before this same law went into effect, can not take advantage of the provisions of Article 12 thereof by the terms of which only those are exempted from their military obligations who have lost their Italian citizenship during their minority through the naturalization of their parents.

Upon this same principle, they can not even take advantage of Article 7, which exonerates from their military obligations, upon their formal renunciation, those who, born and residing in a foreign country, are considered by such countries citizens by birth.

In bringing the foregoing to your excellency’s attention it may be opportune for me to advise your excellency that, according to the information obtainable, Ajello did not return to Naples again and seems to have succeeded in getting out of Italy, leaving his address as No. 2433 First Avenue, New York.

Pray accept [etc.]

S. Sonnino