As this statement appears to imply a lack of good faith on the part of
this Government in the settlement of the Lusitania case, I would like to be advised as to the
authenticity of the statement and also as to the official who is
responsible for it.
[Enclosure]
Clipping From the “Washington Post,” February 18,
1916
The suggestion was made last night in diplomatic circles that the
present attitude of the United States on the Lusitania controversy and the whole question of submarine
warfare is based on political expediency. There are three reasons
influencing the administration in its changed course, according to
this diplomatic opinion. These are:
1. If Germany can be induced to consent to embody in her reply to the
Lusitania note the assurances for the
future conduct of submarine warfare he demands, President Wilson may
claim a diplomatic victory.
[Page 534]
2. If Germany insists on confining the Lusitania controversy strictly to the facts of that issue
alone, negotiations can be drawn out until after the election next
November.
3. The speech of Elihu Root, at the Republican State convention in
New York, attacking the administration, has influenced the President
to put on a bold front against the central empires.
Meantime negotiations looking to a settlement of the case have come
to an abrupt halt. For the first time in the nine months that have
elapsed since the dispatch, May 13, 1915, of the first Lusitania note officials of the German
embassy have felt justified in assuming a frankly dilatory
attitude.
One of these officials expressed the embassy’s viewpoint as
follows:
“Until today Germany has supposed that the United States was
sincerely anxious to settle the Lusitania
case with the least possible delay. Now, however, it is apparent
that this is not the situation.
“The United States has taken the view that an immediate
settlement would be a favor to Germany. Quite the reverse is
true. Indefinite postponement would put Germany in the tenth
heaven of delight. The United States, now that it has made its
position clear, can count on all the delay imaginable, so far as
Germany is concerned.”