File No. 893.51/1383.

The American Chargé d’Affaires to the Secretary of State.

No. 778.]

Sir: I have the honor to enclose, for the information and files of the Department, copy in translation of a letter dated March 11, 1913, from the Minister of Finance to the sextuple group relative to the negotiations for the reorganization loan.

I have [etc.]

E. T. Williams.
[Page 169]
[Inclosure—Translation.]

The Minister of Finance of China to the Sextuple Group.

Sir: For almost a year negotiations for a loan made necessary by China’s financial requirements have been in progress with your groups. The terms of the agreement have been frequently discussed in Cabinet meetings and the controlling principles have been arranged satisfactorily. With the exception of the changes regarding the rate of interest and the discount, which I assumed responsibility for, all matters have been referred to the Advisory Council and have been approved. During the negotiations I endeavored by all possible means to preserve good relations with the groups. Adhering to this idea I gave way to the utmost in respect of the demands made by the groups in the hope that a settlement would be reached at an early date, that order would be maintained and lasting peace be secured.

The period of negotiations included the end of the old and the new calendar years and on these two occasions I was placed in a position of great difficulty as there was most pressing need of funds. I would recall that at the end of last year, new style, believing that a method of meeting the urgent conditions would be approved by the Advisory Council, I succeeded in getting the Cabinet to take the responsibility for altering the rate of interest from 5% to 5½%. Then again in your letter of January 28th you stated that with the exception of the issue price in London and the alterations to article 13, which were to be discussed, nothing else in the terms of the agreement would be different from the copy of the agreement sent on January 15th. You further said that prior to the signature of the agreement you should receive from your Ministers information that satisfactory foreign advisers had been engaged for the salt administration and the bureau of audit and a director for the loans bureau and that satisfactory agreement had been made with them et cetera. I at once took steps to engage able and intelligent men, three in number, to fill these positions. I expected that men who had been selected for the [their?] ability, irrespective of nationality, with such great care, would surely be accepted by the groups but on the 4th of February, when the agreement was all in order and the groups had agreed to sign the agreement at once and to make advances, suddenly other complications came up and you could not keep your word. On the 5th I wrote you declaring that prior to the signature of the agreement I reserved the right to borrow elsewhere. Subsequently a reply was received from you saying that so far as the groups were concerned everything was ready for signature and that the delay mentioned by me was clearly beyond your power to control and that you could not take the responsibility. I replied to this on the 6th declaring that I could not take the responsibility for anything outside the scope of the agreement and that, as it was difficult to see how the matter could be brought to a satisfactory conclusion, [I] could not do otherwise than go elsewhere for the funds so urgently needed. But I still remained inactive, hoping that your statement that all was ready for signature would materialize at an early date. More than a month has passed since the date set for signature and on the 3rd of March my Government received the information that the six Governments had decided at a meeting that nationality was to be the controlling factor as regards the engagement of foreigners in connection with the loan agreement; that one Englishman with one German as vice should be appointed to the salt administration; that in the loans department a German should be engaged as director; that as regards the number and functions of the foreigners in the audit department great changes had been made so that, instead of one foreigner, one Russian and one Frenchman were to be appointed. Such essential changes in the original understanding as these had not been calculated upon at any time during the negotiations.

In the negotiations for this loan there were first frequent delays and secondly successive changes of the terms of the agreement and I have been forced into an unimaginably difficult position. The foreign press for the most part calumniates my country. Foreign nations blame us for not paying our debts but at the same time every move they make tends to stop our sources of supply and they do not allow us to pay our debts. Foreign Governments blame us because the new regime is not established but their actions are such as to prevent our raising the funds and they do not allow us to make progress. Our Government is subjected [Page 170] to enormous loss in every way by these delays and it is truly impossible to delay any longer.

As regards the negotiations for this loan I am deeply grateful for the good intentions of the groups. Unintentionally all these complications have arisen so that now the agreement, all ready for signature, has no more substantiality than a picture cake and cannot be put into effect. I deeply regret that the conditions are actually such as described by you in your letter of the 5th February, i. e., beyond control. Responsibility therefore cannot be undertaken. Kindly take note accordingly.

With regards [etc.]

Chou Hsueh Hsi.