No. 26.
Mr. Hall to Mr. Frelinghuysen.

No. 241.]

Sir: In May, 1883, the Costa Rican Congress passed a law making Port Limon, on the Atlantic, a free port for the term often years. Ten months later, the same Congress, without giving any previous notice of its intention, regardless of the foreign interests created, foreign capital invested, and foreign enterprises undertaken under the inducements held out by that act, repealed the law and established the former tariff upon imports. I inclose copies and translations of both decrees.

I inclose also an extract from a letter from Mr. Consul Morrell, with its inclosure from a well-known American who has large interests in that country. From these it appears that the publication and execution of the act of repeal were simultaneous, the Government commencing at once to levy duties on goods imported under the assurances of a free entry.

It appears also that the principal commercial interests of Limon are American; that two merchants of the place are now abroad making purchases of merchandise, in the full faith that it was to be a free port for ten years; that, knowing nothing of the change, they will, of course, upon their return, come into conflict with the Government.

Other parties were making preparations to enter into the business of raising fruit for the markets of the United States.

While there may be no doubt as to the right of the Costa Rican Congress to revoke the law referred to, it seems but just that some previous notice thereof should have been given or a reasonable time allowed the interested parties to adjust their business affairs to the new conditions. As the matter now stands it has all the appearance of bad faith on the part of the Government.

In view of these facts, I have deemed it my duty to instruct the consul at San José to receive the protests of our citizens who may be injured in their interests by the action of the Costa Rican Government, and especially those who have imported goods under guarantee of the law now repealed. I have also addressed a communication to the minister for foreign affairs, of which I inclose a copy.

I have, &c.,

HENRY C. HALL.
[Page 39]
[Inclosure 1 in No. 241.—Translation.]

Law No. 6 of May 22, 1883, making Limon a free port.

The Constitutional Congress of the Republic of Costa Rica decrees:

  • Article 1. The district of Limon is declared to be free of customs imports. The importation of material of war is alone excepted from the exemption established by this article.
  • Art. 2. The Executive is authorized to make the demarkation of the zone which is declared free, for which the port of Limon and Rio Sucio must be taken as starting points.
  • Art. 3. He is authorized also to remove the custom-house to Rio Sucio, to dictate all measures conducive to that end, and to incur the expenses required for the execution of this law.
  • Art. 4. The exemptions thus established shall commence to take effect on the 10th day of August next, and shall continue during ten years.


  • JUAN M. CARAZO,
    President.
  • VICENTE C. SEGREDA,
    First Secretary.
  • A. SANTOS,
    Second Secretary.

Let it be executed.

P. FERNANDEZ.

The Secretary of State for the Department of Finance, Bernardo Soto.

[Inclosure 2 in No. 241.—Translation.]

Law No. 20 of the 19th of June, 1884, repealing law No. 6 of the 22d of May, 1883, by which Limon was made a free port.

The Constitutional Congress of the Republic of Costa Rica, considering that the law of the 22d of May, 1883, has not had the results that were expected of it, but has produced grave prejudice to the customs revenue and to commerce in general; that this revenue being assigned to the payment of the internal debt, whose prompt cancellation is of lively interest to the country, decrees:

Sole article. Said law No. 6 of the 22d of May, 1883, is repealed. (1) The Executive shall provide the necessary regulation for the custom-houses and customs guards. (2) The Executive shall equip two small steam-cruisers for watching the Atlantic coast.

Given in the hall of sessions of the national palace, at San José, the 19th day of June, 1884.

  • JUAN M. CARAZO,
    President.
  • JESUS SALANO,
    Secretary.
  • MANRO FERNANDEZ,
    Secretary.

Let it be executed.

P. FERNANDEZ.

The Secretary of State for the Department of Finance and Commerce.

[Page 40]
[Inclosure 3 in No. 241, extract.]

Mr. Morrell to Mr. Hall.

Sir: * * * I invite your attention to the inclosed copies of law No. 6, dated May 22, 1883, making Limon a free port for ten years from the 10th of August, 1883, and of law No. 20, dated June 19, 1884, repealing it. The question arises in my mind, “How can such things be?” Mr. Volio, among other arguments in support of the repeal, says, “Such things are done all the world over.” His boundary of this world, if not of the whole universe, is probably limited to Spain and all the Spanish-American countries. Would or could the United States Congress repeal a law making a certain port free for ten years, in less than one year I Is not such an act on the part of Congress virtually a contract entered into with the entire outside world for a specified time? As it is, this country will itself be the principal sufferer. Parties with large capital were already making preparations to enter into business at Limon on a large scale; but in consequence of this new law they have retired. But how about the houses already established there? * * * Mr. Willis, Mr. Keith’s representative, promised to give me some facts in regard to this matter, which I will inclose to you if received in time.

Yours, &c.,

A. MORRELL.
[Inclosure 4 in No. 241.]

Mr. Keith to Mr. Morrell.

Sir: Allow me to bring to your notice a great piece of injustice which has been committed by the Government of this Republic, in order that, should you think fit, you may bring the matter before your Government.

According to a decree duly passed by Congress and sanctioned by the executive power, Limon, on the Atlantic coast, was declared a free port, together with a certain zone within given boundaries, for the space of ten years, counting from the 10th of August, 1883, as may be seen from the decree to that effect duly published in the official gazette of this Republic, dated the 23d May, 1883. Since the 10th August last year, in conformity with the decree, said port and zone have been free, but on the 19th of this month, without any previous notice or warning, the Congress have thought fit to pass a decree derogating completely this franchise, which decree has been duly sanctioned by the executive power and published in the official gazette of 21st instant.

The Government has already commenced to collect duties on goods that have arrived or are arriving, although they may have been ordered months ago, in accordance with the decree which establishes the freedom or exemption from customs duties for ten years.

Within the last year a new industry has very much increased in the free zone, and that is the planting and cultivation of bananas by persons of all nationalities, who have made their calculations upon a free port. At the present time from 25,000 to 30,000 bunches a month are exported to New York, which amount is daily increasing, and several projects were on foot for augmenting this business with foreign capital, which was being subscribed for in Boston and New Orleans on the basis of a free port.

Having a contract for the development of the Atlantic division of the Costa Rica Railroad for five years, any change of this kind being made is extremely prejudicial to my interests, not only increasing very considerably the working expenses of the railroad, owing to my having to pay a higher price for labor, but also tending to diminish instead of augment the receipts of banana freights, upon which I had based my calculations, owing to further planting consequent on the decree declaring the port and zone free.

I may mention that the principal merchants in Limon, together with myself, are American citizens, as you are aware, and I think should be entitled to some protection from such an arbitrary act and want of good faith on the part of the Government of one country and the citizens of all others.

Two of the principal merchants of Limon are at present abroad making purchases of merchandise, in the full faith of a free port for ten years> and know nothing of the change just made, and will doubtless come into conflict with this Government, on their arrival here, when duties are exacted. Having very large interests at stake in [Page 41] this country, I am extremely unwilling to come into conflict with the Government, or even to do anything prejudicial to its interests in any way; hut certainly I think that this is a matter that should be inquired into by the different Governments, in the interests of their citizens residents here who may have been misled into entering into business in Limon under the veil of a free port.

Trusting you will give the matter your best attention,

I am, &c.,

MINOR C. KEITH.
[Inclosure 5 in No. 241.]

Mr. Hall to Señor Castro.

Sir: My attention has been invited to the act of the Costa Rican Congress of the 19th ultimo, repealing the decree of the 22d of May, 1883, by which Limon was made a free port for the period often years. I have been informed also that the new act was immediately carried into effect, without any consideration whatever for the foreign interests created under the guarantees of the former law.

While awaiting the definite instructions of my Government, to which I have communicated the facts above mentioned, I am constrained to protest most respectfully, in behalf of American citizens whose interests are affected, against the act of the 19th of June, 1884, and especially against its immediate enforcement, as also against the collection of duties upon merchandise imported under the guarantee and faith of the act of the same Congress which declared Limon to be a free port from the 10th of August, 1883. At the same time I venture to assure your excellency, in advance of definite instructions, that my Government will expect for their citizens full indemnity for all losses and injuries they may sustain in consequence of the action referred to of the Costa Rican Congress.

I have, &c.,

HENRY C. HALL.