Mr. Adams to Mr.
Seward.
No. 602.]
Legation of the United
States, London,
February 19, 1864.
Sir: I have the honor to transmit a copy of my
note to Lord Russell of the 12th instant, in reply to his of the 8th,
heretofore sent forward with my despatch No. 596. I also append a copy
of his note of acknowledgment of the 13th.
The movements of the rebel agents continue quite actively. The steamer
with a mysterious destination is still here. You doubtless continue to
receive full reports concerning her. The efforts to sustain confidence
in the ability to resist are very strong. The Richmond correspondent of
the London Times, a person by the name of Lawley, arrived here in the
Scotia, and is laboring to the best of his ability to sustain the hopes
of their ultimate success. I have reason to believe that he has had
interviews with Lord Palmerston on the one side, and with leading
friends of the United States on the other, in which he professes to
communicate the results of his observation. Without knowing the object
which the rebels have in view in using this man, I am inclined to infer
it must be some ultimate project of an offer of mediation. There is no
reason for supposing that any such notion will be favorably received by
the present government.
The rumors of changes in the military commands again produce unfavorable
impressions of the management of the war. Among other things which I
hear reported by Mr. Lawley is the hope of the rebel commander that
General Meade may be superseded.
I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant,
Hon. William H. Seward,
Secretary of State, &c., &c.,
&c.
Mr. Adams to Earl Russell.
Legation of the United
States, London,
February 12, 1864.
My Lord: I have the honor to acknowledge
the reception of your note of the 8th instant, in reply to mine of
the 19th of last month, in relation to the
[Page 194]
abuses made of the neutrality of her Majesty’s
territories by the insurgents of the United States. I have
transmitted a copy of the same for the consideration of my
government.
It gives me great satisfaction to learn that her Majesty’s government
have taken steps to prevent the violation of the neutrality of her
territories. Such acts, initiated from the frontiers of her
possessions in Canada, are peculiarly dangerous, by reason of the
treaty obligations of the two countries to abstain from armaments on
the waters that separate them in America. It gives me great regret
to be compelled to believe that the projects of carrying on hostile
operations from one or more points along those lines have not yet
been abandoned, and that considerable numbers of men are actually
concentrating in Canada with a view to make an attack on some
unprotected spot. Considering the danger of the complications to
which even a casual and temporary success might lead, I trust I may
be pardoned for recurring once more to the subject. I have never
admitted the idea for a moment that, in acknowledging the
belligerent character of the insurgents, it was the intention of her
Majesty’s government to yield to them extraordinary facilities for
the abuse of the neutrality adopted by Great Britain. But it is
impossible, in the face of the facts, to deny that such has been and
is the case. The very position of a belligerent implies
responsibility for its action. Yet it is quite apparent that thus
far no means have been arrived at by which effectively to impose any
restraint upon its most lawless proceedings. In selecting the
northern borders of the United States these people well understand
the object they have in view, which is not so much to annoy or
harass the population living there as to create a state of
excitement, which might, in its consequences, involve a
misunderstanding between the two nations. Even with the utmost
vigilance of the authorities on both sides, it is scarcely to be
hoped that every attempt of the kind, if often renewed, could be
prevented. It is for this reason that I beg your lordship’s pardon
if I renew my urgency for the adoption of some measures which may
more effectually remove this danger at its very source.
I pray your lordship to accept the assurances of the highest
consideration with which I have the honor to be, my lord, your most
obedient servant,
Right Hon. Earl Russell,
&c., &c., &c.
Earl Russell to Mr. Adams.
Foreign Office,
February 13, 1864.
Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the
receipt of your note of yesterday’s date respecting certain alleged
abuses of neutrality committed within her Majesty’s North American
possessions; and I have the honor to inform you that I have
transmitted a copy of the same to the secretary of state for the
colonial department.
I have the honor to be, with the highest consideration, sir, your
most obedient, humble servant,
Charles Francis Adams, Esq., &c., &c., &c.
Mr. Moran to Mr. Seward.
Legation of the United
States, London,
February 20, 1864.
Sir: By direction of Mr. Adams, I have the
honor to forward herewith, out of the regular course, a copy of The
Index, of the 18th instant, a paper in the
[Page 195]
interest of the rebels, published in London.
At page 107 will be found a narrative of the recent attempt on the
part of a number of the insurgents to invade the United States from
Canada. To this Mr. Adams requests me to call your special
attention.
I have the honor to be, sir, with great respect, your obedient
servant,
BENJ. MORAN, Assistant Secretary of
Legation.
Hon. William H. Seward,
Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.
[From The
(London) Index, of February 18,
1864.]
[Untitled]
The Canadian Expedition.—A gentleman
who was engaged in the frustrated attempt to rescue the
confederate prisoners confined on Johnson’s island, near the
Canadian frontier, writes to us to correct some misstatements
which have obtained currency through the federal press. He says:
“You are aware of the leading facts of this affair, and know
that our object was defeated by the authorities of the province.
Perhaps you have already learned the secrets of the plan, but if
you have not, a few words might be of service. The prisoners who
had been released from Johnson’s island, the federal prison in
Lake Erie, conceived a plan to capture the island and release
the large number of officers confined there. The assent of the
confederate government was asked, but long refused, from a doubt
whether it could be effected without violating the neutrality of
British territory. This objection was at last so far overcome
that a certain number of officers received leave to attempt the
hazardous experiment, but under strict orders to do or permit no
act directly or indirectly liable to be construed into such
violation, to buy no materials of war and enlist no assistance
on British soil, but only to exercise the right of passage as
individuals. Accordingly, upon arriving in Canada, arms and
cannon were purchased in New York, and were sent by parties
there up to the lake, where we could get them. Not an article
was obtained in Canada. Even medicines and surgical instruments
were furnished from New York, and all correspondence with the
prisoners was carried on through the personal column of the New
York Herald. Several British officers wished to join, but they,
as also the assistance of many Canadian gentlemen, were refused.
The basis of our operations was to be on. Yankee territory, the
means for carrying out our object, viz: to release the
prisoners, were to be obtained there alone. This principle was
adhered to in perfect good faith, in spirit as well as in
letter, though not without some difficulty. Success would have
been certain, had not an unexpected obstacle caused delay. The
Michigan, a federal gunboat, had anchored off the island, and it
then became necessary to capture her before releasing the
prisoners. To do this, more men were necessary, and some
confederates, who had recently escaped from camps Chase and
Douglas, were taken as volunteers. There was no one of the party
owing allegiance to Great Britain, or who had ‘found an asylum
on her soil,’ as the papers had it. But when we had completed
our preparations, with the and of friends in the federal States,
the very day before it was to have been executed it reached the
ears of the governor general, and the Yankees, being immediately
warned by him, it became impossible.
“Such is the whole affair in a nutshell. You will see that all we
asked of the Canadian authorities was the right of passage to
Yankeedom, individually and unarmed, we having neither the means
nor the intention to commit a belligerent act before reaching
Yankee jurisdiction. You can draw your own inference from the
facts. Some of the Canadian and even some of the English papers,
I am told, have taken a different, and, as it appears to me, a
wholly erroneous view of the matter.”