S/SNSC files, lot 63 D 351

No. 820
Memorandum by the Executive Officer of the Operations Coordinating Board (Staats) to the Executive Secretary of the National Security Council (Lay)

top secret

Subject:

  • Progress Report on NSC 125/2 and NSC 125/6 (Japan) (Policy approved by the President August 7, 1952 and June 26, 1953)1

There is attached the first Progress Report by the Operations Coordinating Board on NSC 125/2 and NSC 125/6, “United States Objectives and Courses of Action with Respect to Japan.” These NSC papers were assigned to the Board on December 12, 1953; and this report covers the period through September 15, 1954 with the addition of the latest information available on the Japanese economic situation. The report was approved by the Operations Coordinating Board on October 27, 1954.

The Board noted that since September 15, 1954 an agreement on reparations between Japan and Burma, mentioned on page 102 of the report, was initialed in Tokyo on September 25. It provides for payment by Japan of $20 million annually in goods and services over a period of ten years and economic cooperation in the form of joint enterprises with Japanese investment in the amount of $5 million annually for ten years. This agreement will be concluded formally in Rangoon on November 3.

Elmer B. Staats
[Page 1761]

[Attachment]

Progress Report on NSC 125/2 and 125/6

“United States Objectives And Courses Of Action With Respect To Japan”

(Policy approved by the President, August 7, 1952 and June 26, 1953)

a. summary of major actions

1. The United States has in the past two years concluded a number of important agreements with Japan, including a Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement, Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, and revision of the criminal jurisdiction provisions of the Administrative Agreement. Joint agreement was also reached for return of the Amami Oshima group to Japanese control.

2. During 1953 Japan incurred a serious balance of payments deficit notwithstanding a continued high level of United States special expenditures of about $785 million. This imbalance continued during the early part of 1954. Corrective measures initiated by Japan in October 1953 alleviated this condition. For the past six months ending September 1954 a balance of payments surplus appeared even though U.S. special expenditures declined to an annual rate of about $550 to $600 million. Japan was admitted provisionally to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the United States is taking the lead in multilateral negotiations to bring Japan fully into GATT. United States preparations are underway for comprehensive United States–Japanese tariff negotiations, which are scheduled for early 1955. Private technical assistance arrangements and loans totalling $40 million by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development have been made, but Japanese productivity is still deficient in important fields. United States economic assistance to Japan consisted of a grant of $10 million in local currencies to Japan under the agricultural surplus program, and three short-term cotton loans totalling $160 million by the Export-Import Bank. Japan’s contribution to U.S. forces was reduced by $7 million. Negotiations for settlement of the claims of the United States arising out of economic assistance rendered during the occupation (GARIOA) were begun.

3. Japan has increased the size and strengthened the functions of the Japanese defense forces, although the total is still well short of that considered desirable by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The Japanese [Page 1762] Diet has authorized an expansion of Japanese defense forces to a total of 164,538 men, including the new air force, and has empowered them to resist direct attack. The United States provided increased military assistance to Japan, and will continue to do so under the Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement through substantial military grant-aid and training programs. Some progress has been made toward the establishment of a Japanese defense production base, largely through the activation by offshore procurement of a broad range of ammunition and explosive manufacturing facilities for small arms and artillery. Plans are being formulated for the establishment of limited capacity for production of certain tactical military aircraft over the next two years. Arrangements have been completed for a joint United States–Japanese industrial mobilization planning group to study the development of a broader production base in Japan.

4. Vigorous information programs have been carried on to give the Japanese a better understanding of the United States and of world problems and to combat leftist and neutralist influences.

5. Japan has continued to cooperate with the United States on security export controls. Pursuant to understandings with the United States it has gradually reduced the number of items embargoed to Communist China to those multilaterally agreed.

b. operational considerations bearing on policy

6. The NSC 125/2 and NSC 125/6 were designed to cover the immediate post-Treaty period, during which the Japanese were regaining their sovereignty. Certain important objectives have not been achieved and it can be anticipated that troublesome problems in relation to Japan will arise and continue. Economic difficulties, ineffectual governmental leadership, pressure from Communist areas, and reluctance in moving positively toward self-defense have not been solved. In addition, there have arisen a serious increase in neutralist sentiment, periodic flare-ups of anti-Americanism and an intensification of communist overtures to Japan. New factors have arisen in U.S. relations to Asia such as the SEATO and the proposed SEA economic grouping. As a consequence, a complete review of NSC 125/2 and NSC 125/6 and of U.S. objectives and courses of action is recommended.

7. NSC 125/2, paragraph 7b(2) and NSC 125/6, paragraph 3b(1) give emphasis to the development of Japanese ground forces while Defense has stressed the necessity for a force structure composed of appropriate strength in naval and air forces as well as ground. The Japanese on their part appear to question this force concept, laying greater emphasis on air and naval forces. There is also feeling in Japanese military circles that nuclear weapons require revision of [Page 1763] present defense plans. Several problems such as joint planning, Japan’s role in the Far East security picture, and ultimate initiation of withdrawal of U.S. forces have become more important now that Japan has taken the initial steps to expand its defense structure. A new NSC paper should take cognizance of these problems in the light of the current situation.

c. emerging problems and future actions

8. Economic Difficulties

Japan’s economic difficulties present an obstacle to the attainment by the U.S. of certain major objectives in Japan, particularly in respect to the strengthening of international economic relationships, cooperation with other friendly nations of the Far East, and the indigenous support of an adequate defense program. There exists an uncertainty as to the ability of the Japanese Government to continue and expand measures which recently improved the balance-of-payments position in the face of diminishing U.S. military expenditures. Japan’s financial future is further obscured by the unsettled reparations arrangements with Southeast Asian countries, which are also adversely affecting the development of a healthy trade pattern. Decision has been made to establish an FOA mission in Tokyo. The prospective decrease in U.S. special expenditures will increase the difficulties of Japan attaining self-support by Japan, and the U.S. should, therefore, give particular attention and emphasis to (1) reduction of trade barriers, by negotiating with Japan at the GATT negotiations scheduled for February 1955, and by encouraging friendly third countries to negotiate similarly; (2) exercise of greater control over the programming of U.S. Government expenditures in Japan, so as to anticipate and ameliorate the effect of diminishing dollar receipts from this source; (3) improvement of productivity, through a jointly financed technical assistance program, and the investment of dollars and local currencies; (4) provision of continuing support for the Japanese defense structure through military assistance, defense facilities assistance, and offshore procurement;3 (5) assistance and encouragement in the development [Page 1764] of raw material availabilities, particularly in Southeast Asia countries; (6) encouraging the Japanese to improve their receptivity toward foreign private investment and to continue and strengthen sound internal financial and economic measures to improve their international position; (7) provision of economic aid when necessary and appropriate predicating such aid on Japanese participation and self-help.

9. Ineffective Political Leadership

Conservative groups are politically dominant but continue to be split by personal rivalries rather than differences of principle. If these groups could cooperate effectively they would control about two-thirds of each House of the Diet, and would be able to carry out policies on which they generally agree for economic stabilization, control of leftist activity and stronger defense. Particularly needed are government programs to awaken the nation to a sense of international responsibility, to take legal measures against Communists, and to combat the neutralist, anti-American tendencies of many of the individuals in Japan’s educated groups. The U.S. should do what it can to encourage effective conservative action in Japan, although the immediate prospects of conservative merger and effective government leadership are not good.

10. Inadequacy of Defense Measures

Measures undertaken by the Japanese Government to expand its self-defense forces including tentative five-year plans, fall far short of the goals set by the JCS. In contrast to the JCS force goals of 348,000 for ground forces, the Japanese Government has shown a comparatively greater interest in expanding its air and naval forces. Serious disappointment has been shown by the Japanese Government in the alleged failure of the U.S. to make available the 17 naval vessels requested. However, a general support has been obtained for the government’s defense program and there appears [Page 1765] to be a growing popular acceptance of military institutions. In addition to the economic situation, there are political and psychological factors which impede the development of an adequate defense program. A growing tendency is becoming evident on the part of the Japanese Government to make any defense build-up dependent on increased U.S. military and economic assistance and reduction in Japan’s contribution to the maintenance of U.S. security forces in Japan. In view of the present international picture in the Far East the pressures in this direction can be expected to increase rather than to diminish. The U.S. should continue programs of military assistance as well as efforts to reach agreement with Japan on the size and strategic role of its forces. Further progress toward the establishment of a Japanese defense base adequate to meet U.S. objectives will be dependent largely on the furnishing by the U.S. of technical production services, facilities assistance, educational orders, and a continuing offshore procurement program; and the development of all these programs will call for a substantial cooperation by the Japanese themselves. In view of Japan’s reluctance to act positively and the economic situation, with the likelihood of diminishing U.S. military assistance funds—particularly those authorized for offshore procurement—the U.S. must be prepared to take measures to provide specifically for this purpose, or accept a slow rate of development in this field.

11. Attraction of Communist Trade

The consolidation of Communist power in Mainland China and North Korea and its expansion into Southeast Asia are exerting pressure on Japan to increase economic relations and to consider more seriously establishment of political relations with Communist Asia. Japanese ties, both political and economic, to the United States and the free world will remain proportionately much greater, but under foreseeable circumstances trade with the Asian mainland will exercise a powerful attraction. If the Communists see fit to encourage it, such trade could develop substantial magnitudes even under present international multilateral limitations. While United States influence on Japan and bargaining power would remain considerably greater, the development of Communist trade will probably tend to give the Japanese Government a greater sense of freedom in dealing with the United States. A major purpose of measures discussed under paragraph 8 above is to assist Japan in resisting Communist attractions and align Japan more firmly with the United States. It should be noted that Indochina itself is not of great trade significance for Japan but the problem of Communist attraction and pressure would be greatly increased by Communist expansion into other areas of Southeast Asia.

12. Formation of Western Pacific Defense Arrangement

[Page 1766]

NSC 5429/2,4 Section II, 2d provides that the U.S. should “encourage the conditions which will make possible the formation of, and be prepared to participate in, a Western Pacific collective defense arrangement, including the Philippines, Japan, the Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea, eventually linked with the Southeast Asia security structure and ‘ANZUS’ “. This policy statement clearly accords with the course of action set forth both in NSC 125/2, para 7a(4), which provides that the U.S. should encourage Japan and the free countries of the Pacific area to develop relationships which will contribute to their security, and in NSC 125/6, para 3a(2), which provides that the U.S. should continue to explore the possibilities of collective security arrangements in the Pacific area which would include Japan. The problem of developing a sense of interdependence in the area, which is clearly the necessary prerequisite to the establishment of a security organization of the nature contemplated, and U.S. actions taken to overcome this difficulty, are discussed on pp. 9–11 of Annex A. In particular a resolution of outstanding issues between Japan and Korea and the settlement of the reparations and other questions between Japan and the Philippines, Indonesia, Burma and the Associated States are prerequisites to the effective development of constructive political relationships, economic cooperation and collective security arrangements in the Far East.

13. Need for Intensified Information Programs

The complex emotional reactions of the Japanese, particularly as sensationally represented in their press, to United States actions and policies, the threat of nuclear warfare, and the growth of Communist power in Asia have tended more and more to prejudice United States–Japanese relationships. To strengthen countermeasures an intensive reevaluation both of the existing Psychological Strategy Program for Japan (PSB D–27) and of its implementation by the various agencies concerned is necessary, (pp. 14–16, of Annex A). The Inter-Agency Committee in Tokyo, which was established to implement the psychological strategy plan has not thus far been effective except for the handling of the Troop Acceptance problem. The committee, which has met only infrequently, has not been able to bring to bear the full strength of U.S. capabilities in furtherance of our psychological objectives. Ambassador Allison has been asked to make recommendations as to how the committee may be made more effective.

14. Psychosis Regarding Nuclear Weapons

[Page 1767]

The violence of Japanese reactions to any matter relating to nuclear weapons is an element in all of our relations with Japan and raises particular problems in connection with any further U.S. tests in the Pacific as well as in relation to U.S. actions in the development of peaceful use of nuclear energy.

15. A number of lesser problems require continuing United States consideration:

(a)

War Criminals

The continued incarceration of Japanese war criminals sentenced by United States courts remains an important source of friction between the United States and Japan and creates a psychological climate which is not conducive to full Japanese cooperation with the United States. The expeditious handling of cases by the Board of Clemency and Parole, to the end that only a hard core of prisoners who committed the most heinous crimes remain in prison by the end of 1955, is important to implementation of United States objectives toward Japan.

(b)

Japanese Desire for Return of Ryukyus and Bonins

The Japanese Government and people continue to desire the return of the Ryukyu and Bonin Islands to Japan, although public pressure for their return has declined somewhat, and return of Amami Oshima to Japan was an important source of good-will to the United States. Because of the critical strategic importance of these islands the United States must continue to impress upon the Japanese its intention to retain control over them pending the establishment of enduring conditions of peace and stability in the Far East. (pp. 17–19 of Annex A)

(c)

UN Membership

The Japanese Government continues to seek fuller association with the United Nations and to press for United States action in support of this. (pp. 8–9 of Annex A)

d. extent of agency interests

16. The Departments of State and Defense have been primarily involved in implementation of NSC 125/2 and NSC 125/6 with considerable assistance by the United States Information Agency, the Foreign Operations Administration, the Departments of Treasury and Commerce, and other agencies. …

  1. NSC 125/2 is Document 588. NSC 125/6 is Document 657.
  2. Reference is to page 10 of Annex A to this report, entitled “Detailed Development of Major Actions”, not printed.
  3. The status of economic assistance to Japan is summarized in Annex A as follows:

    “No economic assistance as such is being given Japan in USFY 1955 and none was provided in USFY 1954. The following steps in the nature of financial assistance have been taken: (a) It was agreed to reduce the monetary support by Japan to United States forces in Japan pursuant to Article 25 of the Administrative Agreement from the yen equivalent of $155 million to the yen equivalent of $148 million. (b) The United States has undertaken to furnish military equipment for Japanese forces on a grant or loan basis, the precise equipment to be determined on the basis of further consultations, $78 million of USFY 1954 military assistance funds have been programmed for Japan and $102 million are tentatively programmed for USFY 1955. In addition legislative authority was obtained in the Mutual Security Act of 1954 to transfer equipment for the Japanese ground forces procured out of previous Defense Department appropriations and the authority given in PL 188 is being and will be used for the transfer of vessels, (c) Procurement of military and naval equipment in Japan for Title III countries other than Japan totalled about $70 million in USFY 1954 of which approximately $40 million will be financed by the yen proceeds of the sale of agricultural commodities to Japan under the provisions of Section 550 of the Mutual Security Act. (d) An agreement has been concluded under Section 550 of the Mutual Security Act whereby Japan will purchase approximately $50 million worth of agricultural commodities and one-fifth of the local currency proceeds will be used for assistance to Japanese industry (principally defense industries).

    “The Japanese have proposed additional local currency purchases of United States surplus agricultural commodities in United States FY 1955, yen proceeds to be used for economic development. This proposal is being carefully considered within the United States Government.”

  4. “Review of U.S. Policy in the Far East”, dated Aug. 20, 1954. For text, see vol. xii, Part 1, p. 771.