Memorandum by United States
Chiefs of Staff With Proposed Amendments by
British Chiefs of Staff |
Comments by British Chiefs of
Staff |
i. over-all
objective |
|
1. In conjunction with other Allies to bring about
at the earliest possible date the unconditional
surrender of Japan. |
|
ii. over-all strategic
concept for the prosecution of the war |
|
2. In cooperation with other Allies to establish
and maintain, as necessary, military control of
Germany and Austria. |
|
3. In cooperation with other Allies to bring about
at the earliest possible date the defeat of Japan
by: lowering Japanese ability and will to resist by
establishing sea and air blockades, conducting
intensive air bombardment, and destroying Japanese
air and naval strength; invading and seizing
objectives in the Japanese home islands as the main
effort; conducting such operations against
objectives in other than the Japanese home islands
as will contribute to the main effort; establishing
absolute military control of Japan; and liberating
Japanese occupied territory if required. |
We fully agree that the first priority should be
given to the main operations against the Japanese
Islands. We trust, however, that other
operations in the Outer Zone, which will achieve the
secondary object of evicting the Japanese from all
occupied territories, will receive the fullest
possible consideration. |
[Page 1301]
iii. basic undertakings and
policies for the prosecution of the
war |
|
4. The following basic undertakings are
considered fundamental to the prosecution of the
war:—
- *a.
Maintain the security of the Western Hemisphere
and the British Commonwealth.
- b. Maintain the war-making
capacity of the United States and the British
Isles in so far as it is connected with the
prosecution of this war.
a. Maintain the security and
war-making capacity of the Western Hemisphere and
the British Commonwealth as necessary for the
fulfillment of the strategic concept.
b. c. Support the war-making capacity of our
forces, in all areas, with first priority given to
those forces in or destined
for combat areas.
c. d. Maintain vital overseas lines of
communication.
|
The wording of paragraph 4 b. as proposed by the United States Chiefs
of Staff does not allow for the maintenance of the
war-making capacity of such countries as Canada,
India or Australia, all of which are making an
important contribution towards the prosecution of
the war. War-making capacity
cannot be confined solely to that required for the
defeat of Japan since it is also necessary to meet
the requirements for military control of Germany and
Austria as stated in the overall strategic concept
for the prosecution of the war. If first priority is given only
to the support of the war-making capacity of forces
in the combat areas, this might lead to the
withholding of priority from the forces destined to
relieve or support them. For example, the forces in
India are required for maintaining the forces in
active operations and providing reinforcements. As
is known many installations supporting the
operations
[Page 1302]
in Southeast Asia Command are outside those areas
which can strictly be termed combat areas. Unless
these requirements are recognized, the war-making
capacity of forces in combat areas will be
jeopardised. |
5. In order to attain the overall objective, first
priority in the provision of forces and resources of
the United States and Great Britain, including
reorientation from the European Theater to the
Pacific and Far East, will be given to meeting
requirements of tasks necessary to the execution of
the over-all strategic concept and to the basic
undertakings fundamental to the prosecution of the
war. The
invasion of Japan and operations directly connected
therewith are the supreme operations in the war against Japan; forces
and resources will be allocated on the required
scale to assure that invasion can be accomplished at
the earliest practicable date. No other operations
will be undertaken which hazard the success of, or
delay, these main operations. 6. The following
additional tasks will be undertaken in order to
assist in the execution of the over-all strategic
concept:
- a.
- Encourage Russian entry into the war against Japan.
[Page 1303]
Provide
such aid to her war-making capacity as may be
necessary and practicable in connection
therewith.
- b.
- Undertake such measures as may be necessary
and practicable in order to aid the war effort of China as an
effective ally against Japan.
- c.
- Provide assistance to such of the forces of
liberated areas as can fulfill an active and
effective role in the present war. or are required to maintain world order in the
interests of the war effort. Within the limits of our
available resources assist co-belligerents to the
extent they are able to employ this assistance in
the present war.
Having regard to the successful
accomplishment of basic undertakings, to provide
such supplies to the liberated areas as will
effectively contribute to the capacity of the
United Nations to prosecute the present war.
- d.
- In cooperation with other Allies conduct
operations, if required, to liberate
enemy-occupied areas.
7. Cargo Shipping Present estimates of the
requirements for cargo shipping indicate the
position to be sufficiently manageable to provide
for the maximum effort in the prosecution of the
war against Japan,
for the maintenance of the
[Page 1304]
war-making capacity of
the British Commonwealth of Nations and the
Western Hemisphere, for an additional amount for
the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the
United Kingdom, and for supplies to liberated
areas. Should further military demands arise for
maintaining the maximum war effort which would bring about a
substantial conflict with British rehabilitation
and reconstruction plans, and supplies to
liberated areas, the shipping situation will be
examined by the two Governments at time in the
light of changed conditions. |
The present wording would appear to limit this
assistance strictly to those forces which can take
part in the war
against Japan. We feel, however, that the necessity
for the maintenance of world order, particularly in
Europe, must be recognised. Having brought about the
liberation of Europe, it would be illogical to allow
unrest to occur owing to lack of forces in the
liberated areas to keep order. The last sentence
of paragraph 6 c. is
unnecessary as it is now dealt with in paragraph 7
below. |