740.00/2–2753: Telegram
No. 157
The Secretary of
State to the Office of the United
States Representative to the European Coal and Steel
Community, at Paris1
confidential
priority
priority
Washington, March 2, 1953—7: 22
p.m.
Edcol 2. Ref Coled 3 Feb 27 on EPC.2
- 1.
- Think Spaak suggestion that Treaty be considered directly by Ministers with ad hoc Assembly leaders as prelude to signature by Governments is not practical and overlooks need for further study by experts within Governments. After this, would probably need further negotiation in inter-governmental working group of some kind (para 3 Deptel 4582 to Paris3).
- 2.
- Somewhat disturbed by Bidault–Van Zeeland attitude (para 2 Coled 3). If Ministers were to regard present draft as merely “basis for discussion” thus repudiating group which they had assigned to work on this Treaty, retarding effect on six-country community could be most serious. Bidault suggestion that Treaty could only be drawn up by regular diplomatic conference seems to us an obstructive conception and as unnecessarily playing down stature of this six-nation group.
- 3.
- While U.S. should not, of course, intervene, believe you should feel free to express view informally whenever appropriate that Ministers should certainly meet with leading ad hoc Assembly members March 9, and would hope this meeting could, as De Gasperi suggested, consider procedure from then on.
Dulles