793B.00/7–951: Telegram
The Consul General at Calcutta (Wilson) to the Secretary of State
28. We concur Emb’s comments (Embtel 101 July 8 in reply Deptel 42 July 6)1 re present attitude Dalai Lama but wld make fol additional points:
(1) Takster Rimpoche left Yatung after announcement Sino-Tib agreement which he discussed there with DL (see ConGen’s desps 617 June 25 and 625 June 28).2
(2) Message sent Takster by DL re visit to USA (Contel 13 July 3) was not a command. As explained to us by interpreter, msg was not couched in imperative terms but was rather expression of preference on part DL. This accounts to some extent for willingness of Takster disregard brother’s advice. Fears for his personal safety also undoubtedly contributed to decision. We question existence of secret understanding suggested by Emb.
(3) Predictions made in Contel 541 June 26 re probable future action by DL and Tib Govt represent accurate summary statements made to us by Takster. Our impression is Takster sincerely believed at time that DL wld act but that subsequent lack of action made him less optimistic (see first para Contel 16 July 33 conveying his view that DL surrounded by Commie sympathizers and agents who might obtain control at any time).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) We suggest fol as specifications US Govt might take (last para Deptel 42): (a) request Takster on arrival in Wash to send another [Page 1735] msg to DL (which we cld transmit) stressing co-op attitude shown him by GOI and US Govt and reiterating advice that DL issues statement wld leave Tibet; (b) furnish Tibs more detailed statement proposed US financial and mil aid; and (c) make formal reply to ltr from DL which Takster is carrying.
Re (b) above, Thacher, who just returned from Kalimpong, reports Shakabpa asked him obtain confirmation Tibs understanding that US Govt wld provide air transportation from India to Ceylon or other point of refuge for DL and party if they leave. ConGen wld appreciate instrs on this point.
Sent Dept 28, rptd info New Delhi 29.