Lot 55D128: Black Book, Tab 175: Telegram
The Commander in Chief, Far East (Ridgway) to the Joint Chiefs of Staff
310855Z. For info CINCUNC Adv msg HNC 688.
“Report of sub-delegation meeting on item 3. Convened 1100 hours, 31 Dec 51. UNC explained that rewording of first sentence of principle sets forth true objective—peaceful settlement—while previous wording only indicated conference would be held. UNC fur explained meaning of ‘no reinforcing’ as no increase in numerical quantities, only replacement of weapons and articles which become unserviceable during armistice. Stated piece for piece basis for exchange is unshakeable stand. Communists listed existing disagreements (1) holding of political conference (2) replenishment (3) interference in internal affairs. Asserted that UNC wording was hollow and aimed at dodging issue of political conference. Maintained that the method as well as the objective should be included in principle. Hsieh stated that UNC interpretation of replenishment only indicated intent to increase military weapons and equip. Asserted that UNC attempts to maintain ‘state of war’ in Korea to facilitate carrying out war policy throughout world. Hsieh reiterated previous stand that UNC interference in internal affairs main stumbling block and that Communist position of ‘no interference’ is firm. UNC charged Communists with insincerity towards effective armistice. Asserted that en intent is to develop mil air capability during armistice. Charged that Communist insistence on unlimited airfields rehabilitation and construction must be given up if progress is to be made. Col Chang asserted that UNC had admitted that restriction on airfields is interference in internal affairs. Reiterated stand that no combat aircraft be introduced into Korea. Stated Communists may or may not rehabilitate aflds; asserted that this subj is a matter of sovereign rights. Chang said that if either side began to develop aflds on a large scale the other side would imm know of this fact through inspection teams. Maintained that Communists are more concerned over their sovereign rights than airfields. Chang stated no concession could be made which involved the surrender of sovereign rights. Charged UNC with placing obstructions in way of progress. [Page 1471] Claimed that subj of aflds had nothing to do with present conference for a military armistice.
Hsieh charged UNC with delaying negotiations by refusal to remove main stumbling block which is UNCs unreasonable demands to restrict airfields. UNC asked if Communists had anything new to offer.
Communists suggested recess until Jan 1, 1952. UNC agreed. Signed Joy.”